Groowe Groowe BETA / Newsroom
⏱ News is delayed by 15 minutes. Sign in for real-time access. Sign in

Form 8-K

sec.gov

8-K — Ramaco Resources, Inc.

Accession: 0001213900-26-082907

Filed: 2026-07-29

Period: 2026-07-28

CIK: 0001687187

SIC: 1220 (BITUMINOUS COAL & LIGNITE MINING)

Item: Regulation FD Disclosure

Item: Financial Statements and Exhibits

Documents

8-K — ea0299533-8k_ramaco.htm (Primary)

EX-99.1 — RAMACO RESOURCES - BROOK MINE CRITICAL MINERALS PROJECT - INITIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT DATED JULY 28, 2026 (ea029953301ex99-1.htm)

EX-99.2 — SHAREHOLDER LETTER ISSUED BY RAMACO RESOURCES, INC. DATED JULY 29, 2026 (ea029953301ex99-2.htm)

EX-99.3 — PRESS RELEASE ISSUED BY RAMACO RESOURCES, INC. DATED JULY 29, 2026 (ea029953301ex99-3.htm)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img1.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img2.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img3.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img4.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img5.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img6.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img7.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img8.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img9.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img10.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img11.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img12.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img13.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img14.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img15.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img16.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img17.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img18.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img19.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img20.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img21.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img22.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img23.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img24.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img25.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img26.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img27.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img28.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img29.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img30.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img31.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img32.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img33.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img34.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img35.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img36.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img37.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img38.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img39.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img40.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img41.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img42.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img43.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img44.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img45.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img46.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img47.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img48.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img49.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img50.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img51.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img52.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img53.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img54.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img55.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img56.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img57.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img58.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img59.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img60.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img61.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img62.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img63.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img64.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img65.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img66.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img67.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img68.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img69.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img70.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img71.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img72.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-2img1.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-2img2.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-2img3.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-2img4.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-2img5.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-2img6.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-2img7.jpg)

GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-3img1.jpg)

XML — IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT (R1.htm)

8-K — CURRENT REPORT

8-K (Primary)

Filename: ea0299533-8k_ramaco.htm · Sequence: 1

false

0001687187

0001687187

2026-07-28

2026-07-28

0001687187

METC:ClassCommonStockMember

2026-07-28

2026-07-28

0001687187

METC:ClassBCommonStockMember

2026-07-28

2026-07-28

0001687187

METC:Sec8.375SeniorNotesDue2029Member

2026-07-28

2026-07-28

0001687187

METC:Sec8.250SeniorNotesDue2030Member

2026-07-28

2026-07-28

iso4217:USD

xbrli:shares

iso4217:USD

xbrli:shares

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT

REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): July 28, 2026

Ramaco Resources, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

001-38003

38-4018838

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation)

(Commission File Number)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

250 West Main Street, Suite 1900

Lexington, Kentucky 40507

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(859) 244-7455

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K

filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act

(17 CFR 240.14a-12)

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the

Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the

Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b)

of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value

METC

Nasdaq Global Select Market

Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value

METCB

Nasdaq Global Select Market

8.375% Senior Notes due 2029

METCZ

Nasdaq Global Select Market

8.250% Senior Notes due 2030

METCI

Nasdaq Global Select Market

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is

an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§ 230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check

mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting

standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Item

7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.

On July 28, 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. (the

"Company") received from Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc. a conceptual study titled “Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

– Initial Assessment Report” relating to the Company’s exploratory Brook Mine rare earth and critical minerals project

(the “Hatch Report”). A copy of the Hatch Report is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated

herein by reference.

On July 29, 2026, the Company issued a letter

to stockholders from its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Randall W. Atkins, regarding the latest developments at the Company’s

exploratory Brook Mine rare earth and critical minerals project (the “Shareholder Letter”). The Shareholder Letter discusses

the Hatch Report and the Company’s internal projections. A copy of the Shareholder Letter is attached as Exhibit 99.2 to this Current

Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

On July 29, 2026, the Company issued a press release

(the “Press Release”), announcing that it has released the Hatch Report and posted the following to its website at www.ramacoresources.com:

● The Shareholder Letter;

● The Hatch Report; and

● A video presented during the Ramaco Research Rodeo.

A copy of the Press Release is attached as Exhibit

99.3 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

The information furnished in this Current Report

on Form 8-K under Item 7.01, including Exhibits 99.1, 99.2, and 99.3 attached hereto, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes

of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities

of that section, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the

“Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

Item

9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits

(d) Exhibits.

Exhibit

No.

Description

99.1

Ramaco Resources – Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project – Initial Assessment Report dated July 28, 2026

99.2

Shareholder Letter issued by Ramaco Resources, Inc. dated July 29, 2026

99.3

Press Release issued by Ramaco Resources, Inc. dated July 29, 2026

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL)

1

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

RAMACO RESOURCES, INC.

Date: July 29, 2026

By:

/s/ Randall W. Atkins

Randall W. Atkins

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer

2

EX-99.1 — RAMACO RESOURCES - BROOK MINE CRITICAL MINERALS PROJECT - INITIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT DATED JULY 28, 2026

EX-99.1

Filename: ea029953301ex99-1.htm · Sequence: 2

Exhibit 99.1

This document contains the Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc. Report, as issued on July 28, 2026.

The report is the property of Ramaco Resources, Inc.

© Ramaco 2026 All rights reserved,

including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco

Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial

Assessment Report - July 28, 2026

Ramaco

Resources

Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial

Assessment Report

/s/ F. Delgado

2026-07-28

0

Issued

for Use

Various

Various

F.

Delgado

M.

Woloschuk

Date

Rev.

Status

Prepared

By

Checked

By

Approved

By

Approved

By

Client

H376597-0000-100-146-0002, Rev. 0

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - July 28, 2026

Table

of Contents

Section

1 – Introduction

Section

2 – Process Definition

Section

3 – Capital Cost Estimate

Section

4 – Operating Cost Estimate

Section

5 – Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule

Section

6 – Project Risk and Opportunities

H376597-0000-100-146-0002, Rev. 0

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 1 - Introduction - July 28, 2026

Ramaco

Resources

Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial

Assessment Report - Section 1 - Introduction

2026-07-28

0

Issued

for Use

G.

Law

J.

Gorst

F.

Delgado

Date

Rev.

Status

Prepared

By

Checked

By

Approved

By

Approved

By

Client

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE01, Rev. 0

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 1 - Introduction - July 28, 2026

Table

of Contents

1.

Introduction

1-1

1.1

Project Context

1-1

1.2

Background and Study Objectives

1-2

1.2.1

Typical Project Development Phases

1-2

1.2.2

Concept Study

1-2

1.2.3

Initial Assessment

1-2

1.2.4

Initial Assessment Study (Revised)

1-3

1.2.5

Area / Plant Scope and Battery Limits

1-4

1.2.6

Exclusions

1-4

1.2.7

Work Breakdown Structure

1-4

List

of Figures

Figure

1-1. Typical FEL Process for Project Execution.

1-2

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE01, Rev. 0

Page 1-i

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 1 - Introduction - July 28, 2026

1. Introduction

1.1 Project

Context

Ramaco

Resources Inc. is looking to expand their Brook Mine operations to extract and recover critical minerals such as gallium, germanium,

scandium, and Rare Earth Elements (REEs) incidental to the coal operation. In addition to recovering the critical minerals, the facility

plans to generate high purity alumina (HPA) and high purity silica (HPS) as byproducts.

The

facility features a carbo-chlorination process, commercially applied within the titanium industry, for the extraction and recovery of

the critical minerals. The base-case configuration is intended to process approximately 1.3 million dry metric tonnes of ROM material

per year. A higher-capacity scenario has also been assessed for an Order of Magnitude CAPEX and OPEX only, doubling throughput to 2.6

million tonnes per annum of critical mineral feed while excluding mineralized coal from the feed stream.

This

is a greenfield project based in Ramaco Resources’ Brook Mine in northeastern Wyoming, in proximity to the mining site to facilitate

transportation logistics. The ROM is primarily made up of soft claystones and carbonaceous shales incidental to and adjacent or proximate

to coal seams, allowing for conventional surface mining with potential economic and environmental benefits compared to traditional hard

rock REE extraction. This also enables the feedstock to be used as an energy source for the carbo-chlorination reactors.

The

status of the process work is summarized as follows:

● A

test work plan was developed to confirm a preliminary flowsheet developed in 2025. This flowsheet

mainly comprised of a caustic leach followed by a two-staged acid leach for the recovery

of critical minerals and REEs. Subsequent testing of this process observed high reagent and

water consumption and rheological challenges. Alternative hydrometallurgical approaches were

also found to yield minimal critical mineral recovery.

● Ramaco

engaged a third-party laboratory to perform a carbo-chlorination feasibility trial study.

Based on the results, Ramaco started construction of their personal bench-scale laboratory

to further research carbo-chlorination.

● A

concept level study based on the carbo-chlorination technology was conducted by Hatch. This

included a conceptual flowsheet, a mass balance, and an AACE Class 5 cost estimate.

● The

process definition is to incorporate carbo-chlorination test work results once they become

available during the next phase of the project, improving the cost estimates to Class 4.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE01, Rev. 0

Page 1-1

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 1 - Introduction - July 28, 2026

1.2 Background

and Study Objectives

1.2.1 Typical

Project Development Phases

A

phased project development approach is advocated for complex metallurgical projects such as this critical mineral recovery project. The

Front-End Loading (FEL) approach, as shown in Figure 1-1, is typically applied for processing facilities and is recommended for developing

this project.

Figure

1-1: Typical FEL Process for Project Execution.

Parallel

activities would include test work, environmental and permitting approvals, and other owner’s activities.

1.2.2 Concept

Study

In

July 2025, Ramaco Resources, in collaboration with Fluor Corporation, issued a conceptual study report for the recovery the critical

minerals from the Brook Mine deposit. The facility capacity was based on 1,000 mt per annum of Critical Mineral Oxide (CMO) equivalent.

This included a conceptual flowsheet, mass balance, a Class 5 capital cost estimate (CAPEX) and an operating cost estimate (OPEX). Based

on the economics, Ramaco looked to further the project development to a Class 4 estimate.

1.2.3 Initial

Assessment

Hatch was contracted by Ramaco Resources to conduct a Pre-Feasibility

Study (PFS) and produce a Class 4 estimate based on the Fluor conceptual study. The Fluor study had defined a flowsheet that made use

of caustic leaching to extract critical minerals followed by two stages of acid leach to purify and extract REEs. The Pre-Feasibility

Study (PFS)process development commenced in September 2025, used the same flowsheet, and had an increased facility capacity of 3,000 mt

per annum of CMO equivalent.

As part of the Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS), Hatch and Ramaco

engaged SGS and ElementUSA to complete test work to validate the Fluor conceptual study flowsheet. Due to difficulties replicating conceptual

study results, testing deviated to finding alternative technologies for recovering the critical minerals. As of March 2026, collaboration

with both laboratories were suspended as Ramaco looked to pursue pyrometallurgical options and neither were equipped to perform the studies.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE01, Rev. 0

Page 1-2

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 1 - Introduction - July 28, 2026

As

the flowsheet was modified to incorporate carbo-chlorination, the Hatch PFS was paused in December 2025 and a revised Initial Assessment

study was started in its place due to insufficient flowsheet definition. The next phase of the project is scheduled to recommence following

the conclusion of the Hatch Initial Assessment Study and will incorporate Ramaco test work results. Test work conducted by Ramaco is

set to start in September 2026, once construction of the bench-scale laboratory is complete.

1.2.4 Initial

Assessment Study (Revised)

In

March 2026, Hatch started revising the process definition for the Brook Mine Rare Earth Project based on client input. Ramaco engaged

Kingston Process Metallurgy Inc. (KPM) to provide preliminary information in regards to carbo-chlorination technology for the recovery

of critical minerals.

The

new flowsheet is a novel process of existing technology with pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical operations to recover critical

minerals as gallium metal, GeO2, Sc2O3 and Mixed Rare Earth Carbonates (MREC). Carbo-chlorination is

typically utilized to selectively chlorinate and extract critical minerals from a quartz-clay feedstock. Preliminary data from KPM has

been incorporated into the design.

The

main objective of the Initial Assessment Study is to provide a preliminary process definition to assess the financial viability of the

Brook Mine REE Project. Tasks completed by Hatch to meet this objective include:

● Generating

process deliverables including the Block Flow Diagram (BFD), Process Design Basis (PDB),

Process Design Criteria (PDC), and Mass & Energy Balance (MEB). If applicable, test data

has been incorporated.

● Developing

a high level facility layout and overall footprint requirements.

● Creating

a preliminary Mechanical Equipment List (MEL) and preparing technical specifications for

major equipment supply packages to issue to vendors for budgetary proposals to support the

CAPEX.

● Developing

a capital cost estimate as per AACE Class 5 guidelines with an intended accuracy of +30%/-50%.

● Developing

an operating cost estimate.

● Preparing

a preliminary execution strategy and schedule.

● Developing

a study final report.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE01, Rev. 0

Page 1-3

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 1 - Introduction - July 28, 2026

1.2.5 Area

/ Plant Scope and Battery Limits

The

scope and battery limits for some process areas (as listed below) are defined in the following subsections to aid in communicating roles

and responsibilities.

Refer

to the PDB (H376597-0000-210-226-0002) for additional information.

1.2.5.1 Beneficiation

● All

Beneficiation equipment.

● Utilities

are assumed to be shared and distributed from the Process Plant. A local substation or e-house

may be available, and needs to be further evaluated in the next phases of the project development.

● ROM

and coal delivered via trucks by Ramaco. Battery limit at the truck discharge station.

● Instrumentation

and controls required to operate the system.

● All

foundations and structures required for the Beneficiation area.

1.2.5.2 Process

Plant

● All

equipment required for the Process Plant.

● Utility

distribution within the plant boundaries. Power battery limit at the high voltage power supplied

to the incoming terminals of the plant substation. Includes the main substation and downstream

electrical distribution. Water battery limit at the tie-in from the local well.

● Instrumentation

and controls required to operate the system.

● All

foundations and structures required for the Process Plant.

1.2.6 Exclusions

The

following are excluded from the Hatch project scope of work:

● Off-site

infrastructure such as power supply, access roads, natural gas supply, and raw water supply.

● Waste

and tailings management.

Those

are covered by Ramaco under the Owner’s Cost.

1.2.7 Work

Breakdown Structure

Refer

to the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS, H376597-0000-100-026-0001) for a comprehensive list of each area identified in the project.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE01, Rev. 0

Page 1-4

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

Ramaco

Resources

Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial

Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition

2026-07-28

0

Issued

for Use

T.

Hodkinson

J.

Gorst

F.

Delgado

Date

Rev.

Status

Prepared

By

Checked

By

Approved

By

Approved

By

Client

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

Table

of Contents

2.

Process Definition

2-1

2.1

Process Design Basis

2-1

2.2

Process Overview

2-2

2.3

Process Description

2-4

2.3.1

2300 Fuel, Steam, Air and Cooling

Water Systems

2-4

2.3.2

2400 Water and Sewage Systems

2-5

2.3.3

3100 Physical Separation

2-6

2.3.4

3200 Pre-Treatment

2-7

2.3.5

4100 Carbo-Chlorination

2-9

2.3.6

4200 Critical Mineral Recovery

2-11

2.3.7

4300 Rare Earth Recovery

2-13

2.3.8

4500 Residue Management

2-16

2.3.9

4600 Chlorine Recovery

2-17

2.3.10

5100 Liquid Reagents

2-18

2.3.11

5200 Solid Reagents

2-18

2.3.12

5300 Gas Reagents

2-18

2.4

Process Model

2-19

2.5

Mass & Energy Balance

2-20

2.5.1

Key Elemental Recoveries

2-20

2.5.2

Utility Recovery

2-22

List of

Figures

Figure 2-1:

Process Overview Excluding the Reagents and Utilities.

2-3

Figure 2-2:

Two-Stage Crude Fractional Distillation System.

2-10

List of

Tables

Table 2-1:

Key Operational Parameters for the Brook Mine Critical

Mineral Project.

2-1

Table 2-2:

Causes for Product Loss in Model.

2-20

Table 2-3:

Key Elemental Recovery Overview.

2-21

Table 2-4:

Overall Water Balance for the Brook Mine Process Plant.

2-22

Table 2-5:

Overview of Process Water Usage and Recovery.

2-23

Table 2-6:

Overview of DI Water Users.

2-24

Table 2-7:

Overview of Cooling Water Users.

2-25

Table 2-8:

Overview of Steam Usage and Condensate Return.

2-26

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-i

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

2. Process

Definition

2.1 Process

Design Basis

This

section provides an overview of key parameters in the Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project Process Design Basis (PDB). The key criteria,

including the plant utilization, throughput, feed material composition, and production rates are summarized in Table 2-1 below. Where

ROM is the Run of Mine, TREE is the Total Rare Earth Elements, CMO is the Critical Mineral Oxides (Total Rare Earth Oxides (TREO), Sc2O3,

Ga2O3 , and GeO2), HPA is High Purity Alumina, and HPS is High Purity Silica.

Table

2-1: Key Operational Parameters for the Brook Mine Critical Mineral Project.

Parameter

Units

Values

Plant

Availability

%

92

Annual

Operating Hours

h

/ y

8,059

ROM

Annual Throughput Flowrate1

dry

million mt / y

1.3

ROM

Critical Mineral Concentration

ppm

404.46

TREE

Concentration

ppm

344

Sc

Concentration

ppm

20.9

Ga

Concentration

ppm

37.2

Ge

Concentration

ppm

2.4

Coal

Critical Mineral Concentration

ppm

334.01

TREE

Concentration

ppm

307.01

Sc

Concentration

ppm

18

Ga

Concentration

ppm

8

Ge

Concentration

ppm

1

Target

CMO Equivalent Production2

dry

mt / y

574

Original

Target HPA Production

mt

/ y

1,800

Updated

Target HPA Production – July 20263

mt

/ y

11,848

Target

HPS Production

mt

/ y

18,617

1 This

flowrate does not account for coal throughput, which is varied based on carbo-chlorination

demand.

2 This

production rate is based on the equivalent oxide production of Ga metal, GeO2,

Sc2O3, and mixed rare earth carbonate (MREC).

3 An

updated HPA production rate was provided by Ramaco (email: “RE: HPA Production”,

received July 8th, 2026). While the original production rate is used for the process

definition and site plan, the updated HPA production rate is the basis for the CAPEX and

OPEX.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-1

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

General parameters were either based

on the previously completed report by Fluor, provided by Ramaco through email or RFI correspondences. Feed critical mineral concentrations

for the ROM and coal were based on third-party test work and confirmed by Ramaco (refer to RFI 0006, H376597-0000-210-465-0006).

The

target CMO production rate is based on CMO-equivalent flowrates and an assumed 90% overall recovery of CMOs. This value excludes any

critical minerals introduced by the coal. The actual CMO recoveries can be found in the Section 2.5.

For

more information refer to the PDB (H376597-0000-210-226-0002).

2.2 Process

Overview

This

section provides a process plant overview based on Work Breakdown Structure (WBS – H376597-0000-100-026-0001). Area 4400, Tailings

Filtration and Storage, was excluded from Hatch’s scope of work.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-2

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

Figure

2-1: Process Overview Excluding the Reagents and Utilities.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-3

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

Process

operations within each WBS block is summarized as follows:

● Physical

Separation: feed preparation by reducing particle size distribution, with some quartz removal

from the ROM.

● Pre-Treatment:

ROM drying and calcination, coal coking, and applicable off-gas treatment.

● Carbo-Chlorination:

chlorination of the ROM and coke leading to the volatilization of select species. The gas

stream is passed through a series of de-sublimators and fractional distillation to systematically

remove select species.

● Critical

Mineral Recovery: individually recovered Ga, Ge, Al, and Si streams are refined to produce

Ga metal, GeO2, HPA, and HPS.

● Chlorine

Recovery: any chloride-rich waste or purge streams are combined to produce Cl2

gas which is recycled to the Carbo-Chlorination area.

● Rare

Earth Recovery: non-volatilized chloride solids from Carbo-Chlorination are leached in water

and treated to produce Sc2O3 and MREC.

● Residue

Management: any hydrometallurgical waste streams (including crud) from the process are combined,

neutralized, crystallized, and dried prior to disposal.

For

more information, refer to Section 2.3.

2.3 Process

Description

This

section provides an overview of the process areas within the plant. The process descriptions are presented in accordance with Figure

2-1 and the WBS (H376597-0000-100-026-0001).

For

additional information, refer to the PDB (H376597-0000-210-226-0002), Process Design Criteria (PDC, H376597-0000-210-210-0001), Block

Flow Diagram (BFD, H376597-0000-210-252-0005), and Stream Table (H376597-0000-210-216-0002).

2.3.1 2300

Fuel, Steam, Air and Cooling Water Systems

2.3.1.1 2310

Plant Air System

This

system excludes any air requirement for the Air Separation Plant. Refer to Section 2.3.12 for additional information.

Plant

air is sourced from compressed air on-site. Compressed air is generated using air compressors. The compressed air is temporarily stored

in the air receivers before distribution. The pressure is then dropped to the desired value depending on the user requirement. Plant

air is distributed throughout the site for dust collection, pneumatic conveying, plate filter requirements, polishing filter requirements,

and reagent offloading.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-4

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

2.3.1.2 2320

Instrument Air System

Plant

air is used to supply instrument control. A portion of low pressure air is dried using air dryers. The instrument air is distributed

to various users within the plant.

2.3.1.3 2330

Steam Generation and Distribution

This

area distributes live steam to end users. Saturated steam is generated in a natural gas fired boiler package supplemented by a glycol

heat recovery system from the Residue Oxidation area. The steam is distributed at 152°C and 5 bar(a) to supply the Mechanical Vapour

Recompression (MVR) systems, distillation columns and ROM dryers. Returned steam condensate and DI water (as make-up source) are used

to produce fresh steam.

2.3.1.4 2340

Cooling Water Systems

This

area produces and distributes cooling water to remove excess heat from heat exchangers, de-sublimators, and distillation columns. An

evaporative cooling tower is used to produce 25°C water that is distributed throughout the plant and returned at 50°C. Process

water is used as make-up source to the cooling tower, supplementing tower losses from evaporation, drift or blowdown.

2.3.2 2400

Water and Sewage Systems

2.3.2.1 2410

Deionized Water Production and Distribution System

This

area produces and distributes deionized (DI) water for impurity-sensitive areas. It is used as diluent, cake wash water, and hydrolysis

water source for the production of GeO2, MREC, and Sc2O3. DI water is supplemented by treated process

water and is distributed throughout the plant at 25°C. Details regarding the DI water production package are to be defined by vendors.

2.3.2.2 2420

Process Water and Condensate Distribution System

This

area produces and distributes process water throughout the plant. Process water is distributed at 50°C to supply de-sublimators,

filters, centrifuges, leach tanks, gas scrubbers, and mineral process water system. Process water from the de-sublimators and recovered

from MVR systems are cooled to 50°C and re-distributed as process water. Process water is supplemented by treated raw well water.

Details regarding the raw water treatment package are to be defined by vendors.

2.3.2.3 2430

Potable Water Production and Distribution System

Potable

water is supplemented by the process water. It is currently assumed that treated raw water (i.e., fresh process water) is sufficient

to meet potable water requirements. Potable water is distributed at ambient temperature for ablutions, drinking fountains, eyewash and

safety showers.

2.3.2.4 2440

Fire Water System

Treated

process water is used as source of fire water. An off-take from the treated raw water stream is used as make-up water for the fire water

system.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-5

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

2.3.3 3100

Physical Separation

2.3.3.1 3110

ROM Feeding

ROM

and REE-enriched coal are transported via trucks from the mines to their respective comminution circuits. Both feed streams contain levels

of critical minerals (Ge, Ga, Sc), REEs, kaolinite (Al2O3∙2SiO2∙2H2O), and impurities.

See the PDB (H376597-0000-210-226-0002) for additional information.

2.3.3.2 3120

Comminution

The

ROM feed is sent through a series of two crushers, first decreasing the P80 to 40 mm via a tooth rolled crusher and then to 10 mm via

a roller crusher. The crushed ROM is sent to a 2-day storage stockpile and conveyed to downstream operation using a subterranean apron

feeder.

The

coal feed is sent through a primary roller crusher to decrease the P80 to the target size (TBD, pending carbo-chlorination test work).

As the target coal size is currently unknown, a single roller crusher is assumed to be sufficient. The crushed coal is sent to a 2-day

storage stockpile and conveyed to the Coking area using a subterranean apron feeder.

2.3.3.3 3130

Wet Scrubbing

Wet

Scrubbing is used to further decrease particle size and separate the quartz-clay agglomerates, promoting quartz removal downstream.

The

stockpiled ROM is passed through attrition cells to eliminate agglomeration that may have formed during stockpiling. Mineral process

water is added to slurry the ROM to 65 wt.% solids. The slurry is pumped to a log washer to increase residence time for agglomeration

breakdown. Additional mineral process water is added to achieve a 10 wt.% solids slurry. The slurry is then pumped to the Flotation area.

2.3.3.4 3140

Flotation (Quartz Removal)

The

slurry from Wet Scrubbing is pumped to a de-sliming cyclone to separate fine particles from coarser ones. Fine particles are sent directly

to the Thickening & Dewatering area while coarser particles are sent to a flotation conditioning tank. Mineral process water is added

to the slurry to dilute it to 15 wt.% solids. The slurry is pumped to the flotation bank where the flotation collector and frother are

added to promote collection of clay and mica, rejecting quartz in the process.

Flotation

bank overflow is sent to the Thickening & Dewatering area while the underflow is sent to a centrifuge to dewater the quartz solids

for disposal. The centrate is sent to the Thickening & Dewatering area to recapture any fine particles entrained.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-6

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

2.3.3.5 3150

Thickening & Dewatering

The

Thickening & Dewatering area recovers as much mineral process water as possible. This step is essential to minimizing fresh process

water demand to the Wet Scrubbing area and to decreasing energy consumption in the Pre-Treatment area (i.e., ROM drying and roasting).

The

flotation overflow slurry, along with the flotation centrifuge centrate and de-sliming overflow, is sent to a thickener. The thickener

underflow is pumped to a centrifuge to decrease the solid moisture content to 35 wt.% and the cake is conveyed to the ROM Drying area.

The thickener overflow and centrifuge centrate are sent to the Mineral Process Water System to recycle the water.

2.3.3.6 3160

Mineral Process Water System

Water

from the Thickening & Dewatering system is recovered in the Mineral Process Water System. A 2.5 wt.% purge line is included on the

recovered water line to prevent build-up of impurities. Fresh process water is used as make-up source for the mineral process water in

this area. Mineral process water is solely used within the Physical Separation area (WBS 3100).

2.3.4 3200

Pre-Treatment

2.3.4.1 3210

Drying (Kaolinite)

Conveyed

solids from the Thickening & Dewatering area are sent to a kaolinite dryer to decrease cake moisture content from 35 wt.% to 8 wt.%.

The dryer is indirectly heated by steam. The dried cake is sent to the ROM Calcining area. The evaporated water is condensed and recovered

as process water.

2.3.4.2 3220

Calcining (Kaolinite)

Dried

ROM from the Drying area is passed through a roaster to convert 95% of the kaolinite into meta-kaolinite, generating water in the process.

Any water present is evaporated.

1

This

conversion improves aluminum and silicon chlorination in the Carbo-Chlorination area and prevents potential operational difficulties

from having water present in the system. Pyrite is expected to be oxidized in this roaster, producing SOx by-products (represented as

SO2 and to be confirmed by test work) that require neutralization in the Roaster Off-Gas System area.

2

2.3.4.3 3230

Roaster Off-Gas System

The

ROM roaster off-gas is sent to the Roaster Off-Gas System. This system is composed of two parts: solids recapture, and off-gas treatment.

Solids entrained in the off-gas from the roaster are mainly recovered by a cyclone. The remaining off-gas is then sent through a spray

cooler followed by a trim cooler to reduce the stream temperature to 220°C, as per baghouse temperature limitations. Once cooled

to 220°C, the stream is passed through dust baghouses to recover all residual solids. All recovered solids are sent to the Carbo-Chlorination

area.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-7

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

The

off-gas discharge from the baghouse is sent to a neutralization packed bed scrubber. Dilute sodium hydroxide (2 wt.%) is passed through

the scrubber to solubilize and neutralize the SOx species present in the off-gas.

3

The

neutralized solution is then pumped to the ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying area. The scrubber vent is sent to a stack for

ventilation to the atmosphere.

2.3.4.4 3240

Coking (Coal)

Coal

from a stockpile is conveyed to a nitrogen-blanketed furnace for coking. As the Carbo-Chlorination area is highly sensitive to the presence

of water, coal is transformed into coke within the furnace unit. The coal is mined locally within Brook Mine and contains critical minerals

and kaolinite. Within the furnace unit, kaolinite is converted into meta-kaolinite (refer to Reaction 1) and all water present is evaporated.

Similarly to the Calcining area, pyrite is expected to partially degrade, generating some amounts of sulphur gas due to the oxygen-free

environment that will require neutralization.

4

The

furnace off-gas is sent to the Coking Off-Gas System area to recover the coke and neutralize undesired species.

2.3.4.5 3250

Coking Off-Gas System

The

Coking Off-Gas System is identical to the Roaster Off-Gas System, where the solids are first recaptured and then the off-gas treated

via neutralization scrubber. The air addition in the trim cooler oxidizes the sulphur generated from Reaction 4, producing other SOx

species that are neutralized in the scrubbing unit as per Reaction 3.

5

Recovered

solids are sent to the Carbo-Chlorination area. Refer to Section 2.3.4.3 for additional information.

Residual

organic species found in the off-gas and generated during the coking process are to be used as syngas by the client. This is outside

the scope of this study.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-8

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

2.3.5 4100

Carbo-Chlorination

2.3.5.1 4110

Carbo-Chlorination

Roasted

ROM is conveyed from the Calcining area to the carbo-chlorination fluidized bed reactors, which operate at 1,050°C. Chlorine gas,

from the Chlorine Recover area, is injected into the reactors as chlorine source and fluidizing agent. Coke from the Coking area is added

to facilitate reduction of oxide species and react with free oxygen to form carbon monoxide, driving the chlorination reactions (outlined

below) forward. Impurities are listed in Reactions 6 to 15, where “M” indicates an impurity element.

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Carbo-chlorination

off-gas is sent to cyclones to recapture fine solids and recombine with the solid discharge. The carbo-chlorination solids are cooled

via a paddle cooler to 100°C and then conveyed to the Water Leach area. The remaining off-gas stream is sent to the De-Sublimation

1 area for the recovery of desired species.

2.3.5.2 4120

De-Sublimation 1 (Alkali Salt Removal)

The

Alkali Salt Removal de-sublimator cools the carbo-chlorination off-gas to 400°C, selectively de-sublimating REEs and other species

that may have unintentionally been vaporized or sublimated. The off-gas from the de-sublimator is sent to a cyclone to recapture fine

solids. The solids are sent to the Water Leaching area while the gas stream is sent to a secondary de-sublimation unit, De-Sublimation

2.

2.3.5.3 4130

De-Sublimation 2 (Ferric Removal)

The

Ferric Removal de-sublimator cools the gas stream from the first de-sublimator to 280°C to de-sublimate FeCl3. The off-gas

is sent to a cyclone followed by a ceramic filter to recapture all the de-sublimated solids. It is then sent to De-Sublimation 3. The

solids are sent to the Residue Oxidation area to recover the chlorine as Cl2 gas.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-9

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

2.3.5.4 4140

De-Sublimation 3 (Al / Ga Recovery)

The

Al / Ga Recovery de-sublimation system is made up of a pre-cooler and a de-sublimating venturi scrubber. The pre-cooler lowers the gas

temperature to 150°C via indirect cooling with cooling water. The cooled gas is then sent to a venturi scrubber where a Ga-rich n-dodecane

solution is used to further cool the gas to 140°C. This temperature drop de-sublimates AlCl3 and condenses GaCl3.

The GaCl3 is then subsequently displaced into n-dodecane due to its high organic solubility.

A

centrifuge is used to separate the Ga-rich n-dodecane from the AlCl3 solids. The solids are sent to the Alumina Separation

& Recovery area while the Ga-rich n-dodecane is primarily recycled to the venturi scrubber to further concentrate the solution. A

small bleed of the concentrated solution is sent to the Gallium Separation & Recovery area for gallium metal production.

2.3.5.5 4150

Off-Gas Separation

The

off-gas from the De-Sublimation 3 area is sent to a pre-condenser unit. This unit lowers the temperature to 50°C, the chloride species

are condensed and the incondensable species are sent to off-gas treatment. This step decreases the volumetric flow downstream. Following

the pre-condenser, the liquor is sent to a two-stage crude fractional distillation system to recover Ge- and Si-rich solutions. Figure

2-2 below outlines the fractional distillation system and the destination of each discharge stream.

Figure

2-2: Two-Stage Crude Fractional Distillation System.

The

residual off-gas stream from the pre-condenser is passed through a packed bed scrubber to neutralize any residual SOx and Cl2

that may be present. Dilute sodium hydroxide (2 wt.%) is passed through the scrubber and the neutralized discharge is sent to the

ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying area. The remaining gas is sent through a thermal oxidizer to convert CO into CO2

and then through to a stack for ventilation to atmosphere.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-10

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

2.3.6 4200

Critical Mineral Recovery

2.3.6.1 4210

Gallium Separation & Recovery

The

Ga-rich n-dodecane bleed from the De-Sublimation 3 area is sent to a Ga stripping mixer-settler. The organic solution is contacted with

DI water to hydrolyze and re-solubilize Ga in the aqueous solution. The organic discharge is returned to the De-Sublimation 3 centrifuge

to be used as fresh n-dodecane. The aqueous discharge is first passed through a pair of multimedia filters to recover any entrained organic

and then sent to the Ga precipitation tank. The recovered organic is sent to the n-Dodecane Crud Treatment area to ensure proper phase

separation prior to recycling the n-dodecane.

Aqueous

Ga is precipitated as Ga(OH)3 via pH adjustment to pH 7 with a sodium hydroxide solution.

16

The

slurry is passed through a thickener and filter press to reduce the moisture content to 25 wt.%. The cake is then re-dissolved in

DI water and sodium hydroxide for electrowinning. For the re-dissolution step, sodium hydroxide pellets are used to minimize reagent

impurity entrainment. The dissolved solution is fed to electrowinning cells to produce Ga metal. The metal (in liquid form) drains from

the electrode and pools at the bottom of the cell. This is then decanted off and packaged in plastic bottles. The residual electrowinning

solution is partially recycled to the re-dissolution tank while the remainder is sent to the ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying

area.

2.3.6.2 4220

Alumina Separation & Recovery

Solids

from the De-Sublimation 3 centrifuge are sent through a n-dodecane displacement step. As n-dodecane and AlCl3 have similar

boiling/sublimation points, it is difficult to properly separate them from one another. As such, a centrifuge is used to displace the

n-dodecane with hexane, an organic with a much lower boiling point (~69°C). This allows for recovery of AlCl3 as the wet

cake is sent through a drying unit to evaporate the hexane. Hexane can then be condensed and recycled. Displaced n-dodecane is recovered

and recycled back to the De-Sublimation 3 area.

Dried

aluminum solids are split into two streams based on target annual HPA production: one for HPA production and the other sent to Chlorine

Recovery area for Cl2 gas generation. The HPA production line sends the solids to a pyrolysis reactor operating at 1,150°C

where pure oxygen is injected to produce alumina.

17

Off-gas

from the reactor is passed through a cyclone to recover any solids entrained and then sent to the Chlorine Recovery area to recover chlorine

from any unreacted AlCl3.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-11

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

The

Al2O3 solids are sent to a furnace, where they are held at 1,100°C for 3 hours to ensure conversion of all

Al2O3 solids to the alpha form. The product is then cooled to 70°C for packaging into bulk bags.

2.3.6.3 4230

Germanium Separation & Recovery

The

Ge-rich solution from the Off-Gas Separation crude fractional distillation system is sent to a HCl-azeotropic still operating at 108°C

to remove impurities (i.e., Si, Ti, and P). DI water is added to the still to hydrolyze the impurities.

18

19

20

21

While

Ge also hydrolyzes in the presence of water, the acid generated from the other reactions re-solubilize the Ge as it is soluble in hydrochloric

acid solutions greater than 7.8 M. Within the still, water, hydrochloric acid and GeCl4 are expected to evaporate at 108°C.

The vapour is condensed and sent to a decanter operating at 40°C to selectively extract the GeCl4 as it is a much denser

liquor than water and hydrochloric acid.

The

water and hydrochloric acid solution is partially recycled to the azeotropic still and the residual is sent to the ZLD Waste Neutralization,

Evaporation & Drying area. The azeotropic still bottom discharge, primarily containing SiO2, TiO2 and H3PO3,

is sent to the ZLD Waste Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying area.

DI

water is added to the concentrated GeCl4 solution to hydrolyze the Ge, allowing it to precipitate and be recovered following

a solid-liquid separation.

22

The

product is dried at 110°C to a moisture content of 5%. It is then cooled to 50°C and packaged into drums.

2.3.6.4 4240

Silica Separation & Recovery

The

Si-rich solution from the crude fractional distillation system (see Figure 2-2) is split into two streams based on annual target HPS

production: one for HPS production and the other sent to Chlorine Recovery area for Cl2 gas generation. The silica production

line sends the liquid SiCl4 to a flame pyrolysis reactor operating at 1,200°C where pure oxygen is injected to produce

silica.

23

Off-gas

from the reactor is passed through a cyclone and ceramic filter to recover any solids entrained and then sent to the Chlorine Recovery

area to recover chlorine from any unreacted SiCl4. The solids are sent to a cooler prior to packaging and storage of the silica

product in bulk bags.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-12

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

2.3.7 4300

Rare Earth Recovery

2.3.7.1 4310

Water Leaching

Unreacted

solids and non-volatilized chloride species from the Carbo-Chlorination area are sent to the Water Leaching area where water is used

to repulp and dissolve the chloride solids. This includes the dissolution of REEs and some impurities. The slurry is pumped to filter

presses to separate the residual solids from the liquor. The solids are sent to the Waste ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying

area for disposal. The liquor is sent to an evaporation unit to remove excess water from the solution. A MVR is included as part of the

evaporation system to decrease steam consumption.

The

concentrated solution is sent to the Al-Sc Hydroxide Recovery area for separation of Al and Sc from the liquor. The evaporator condensate

is recycled in the plant as process water.

2.3.7.2 4320

Al-Sc Hydroxide Recovery

The

concentrated liquor from Water Leaching evaporator is pumped to a ferric reduction tank, where elemental iron is added to reduce any

ferric present to ferrous form.

24

Ferrous

ions have greater solubility in less acidic (i.e., more neutral) pH conditions. This is necessary to prevent the co-precipitation of

Fe with products in downstream units.

The

solution is pumped through candle filters to remove any Fe that remained undissolved. The filtrate is sent to a pH adjustment tank for

the precipitation of Al and Sc. Sodium hydroxide is added to achieve a target pH of 4 and selectively precipitate Al(OH)3

and Sc(OH)3.

25

26

The

resulting slurry is then pumped through filter presses. The Sc-rich cake is sent to the Scandium Separation area while the filtrate is

sent to the Rare Earth Separation area.

2.3.7.3 4330

Scandium Separation

The

solids precipitated in Al-Sc Hydroxide Recovery are re-dissolved in hydrochloric acid at a pH of 0.2. The tank is maintained at 35°C

to minimize organic volatilization in the solvent-extraction (SX) units downstream.

27

28

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-13

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

The

solution is sent through a candle filter to ensure that minimal solids are present prior to SX. Presence of solids in mixer-settlers

increase the rate of crud formation.

After

filtration, the solution is passed through a Sc SX circuit which includes extraction, washing and stripping stages. Exact number of mixer-settlers

per section is still pending and to be determined based on test work. The organic extractant used for this circuit is PC-88A (aka P507,

Ionquest 801). It is diluted in kerosene and TBP is used as a modifier to aid in the organic phase stability. For the extraction stages,

the O:A ratio is 6:1 and the following extraction extents are expected based on literature, where R represents PC-88A.

99%

29

4%

30

The

raffinate from the extraction stage is sent through a pair of multimedia filters to remove any entrained organics and is then pumped

to the ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying area for disposal. Recovered organic from the multimedia filters is sent to Sc Extractant

Crud Treatment area.

Following

extraction, the loaded organic phase is sent to the washing stage to remove entrained impurities (i.e., Al), improving the overall Sc

recovery. A 1 M hydrochloric acid solution is used to wash and scrub the organic solution. The O:A ratio for this stage is based on stoichiometric

requirement.

31

Used

washing solution is sent to the extraction mixer-settlers to recover any Sc that may have accidentally been scrubbed out of the organic

phase.

The

washed, loaded organic solution is sent to the stripping stage. A 2 M sodium hydroxide solution is used to strip scandium from the organic

phase, ensuring a solution pH above 14 so that scandium remains soluble. Within the same stage, partial saponification of the organic

phase is performed. Saponification of PC-88A is required to control the operating pH in the extraction stage and improve extraction extent.

Only 30% saponification was specified to prevent the formation of a third phase in the mixer-settlers. The O:A ratio for this stage is

based on stoichiometric requirement.

32

30%

33

The

stripped organic solution is returned to the extraction stage and the loaded strip liquor (LSL) is passed through multimedia filters

to remove any entrained organic prior to being pumped to the Scandium Oxide Production area. Recovered organic from the multimedia filters

is sent to the Sc Extractant Crud Treatment.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-14

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

2.3.7.4 4340

Scandium Oxide Production

The

Sc-rich solution from the Scandium Separation is sent to a precipitation tank, where hydrochloric acid is added to neutralize the pH

to 8.5. This results in the precipitation of scandium as a hydroxide.

34

The

slurry is then pumped through a thickener and filter press to recover the solids as a wet cake. The scandium cake is calcined at 800°C

to produce scandium oxide solids, evaporating any water present in the process.

35

The

calciner discharge is then cooled, packaged in drums and sent to storage. The residual filtrate is sent to the ZLD Waste Neutralization,

Evaporation & Drying area for disposal.

2.3.7.5 4350

Rare Earth Separation

The

filtrate from the Al-Sc Hydroxide Recovery area is sent to a precipitation tank where sodium hydroxide is added to neutralize the solution

pH to 6.5. This is expected to precipitate the REEs as hydroxides.

36

The

resulting slurry is pumped through a thickener followed by filter presses and the solids are sent to the MREC Production area while the

filtrate is sent to ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying for disposal.

2.3.7.6 4360

MREC Production

The

REE hydroxide solids from Rare Earth Separation are re-leached with hydrochloric acid and passed through a candle filter to separate

the liquor from un-dissolved solids.

37

The

liquor is then pumped to a series of carbonate precipitation tanks, where a sodium carbonate solution (15% Na2CO3)

is added and the REEs are precipitated as hydrated carbonates.

38

Filter

presses are used to isolate the solids, which are washed with DI water prior to being conveyed to a drying unit to decrease the moisture

content to ≤5%. The dried solids are cooled, packaged and sent to storage.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-15

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

2.3.8 4500

Residue Management

2.3.8.1 4510

ZLD Neutralization Evaporation & Drying

Waste

streams from various hydrometallurgical process areas are combined in a neutralization tank. Acidic or basic solids are repulped in the

tank using either process water or water from liquid waste streams. Hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide solutions are added to neutralize

the mixture to a pH of 7.

The

slurry is then passed through filter presses to separate the solids from the liquor. While the solids are directly sent to the drying

unit, the liquor is sent to an evaporative crystallization system to concentrate and precipitate impurities. The evaporative crystallization

system operates at 103°C and contains an evaporator, crystallizer, centrifuge and MVR circuit. The centrifuge centrate is recirculated

to the crystallizer feed to concentrate the solution and maximize precipitation of impurities. The centrifuge cake is sent to a drying

unit.

Cakes

from the neutralization solid-liquid separation and the centrifuge are conveyed and combined at the feed of a rotary dryer. The dryer

operates at 110°C and dries the combined cake to 5% moisture. The dried cake is then conveyed to an on-site stockpile for storage.

2.3.8.2 4520

n-Dodecane Crud Treatment

The

ventilation gas from the Gallium Separation & Recovery mixer-settler is passed through a condenser where the aqueous and organic

vapors are condensed at low temperatures. The vent gas stream is then passed through a mist eliminator to remove residual organic or

aqueous mist and then through an activated carbon column prior to being released to atmosphere. The condensed and coalesced liquids from

the condenser and mist eliminator are drained by gravity to a condensate tank.

Any

organic crud that accumulates in the Ga stripping mixer-settler is manually removed using a portable crud pump. This crud is sent to

a crud tank to be combined with the backwash liquor stream from the organic recovery multimedia filters. The mixed crud solution is pumped

to a three phase centrifuge where the phases (aqueous, organic, and solid) are separated. The organic phase is sent to the recovered

organic tank and is pumped to the De-Sublimation 3 area. The recovered aqueous phase is sent to the gallium precipitation section to

recover any residual gallium present. The solid crud is stored in crud drums for disposal.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-16

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

2.3.8.3 4530

Sc Extractant Crud Treatment

Ventilation

gases from the Scandium Separation SX mixer-settlers are combined and passed through a condenser where the aqueous and organic vapors

are condensed at low temperatures. The vent gas stream is then passed through a mist eliminator to remove residual organic or aqueous

mist and then through an activated carbon column prior to being released to atmosphere. The condensed and coalesced liquids from the

condenser and mist eliminator are drained by gravity to a condensate tank.

Any

organic crud that accumulates in the SX mixer-settlers are manually removed using a portable crud pump. This crud is sent to a crud tank

to be combined with the backwash liquor stream from the scandium organic recovery multimedia filters. The mixed crud solution is pumped

to a three phase centrifuge where the phases (aqueous, organic, and solid) are separated. The organic phase is sent to the recovered

organic tank and is pumped to the Scandium Separation organic feed tank. The recovered aqueous phase is sent to the Scandium Separation

SX feed tank to recover any residual scandium present. The solid crud is stored in crud drums for disposal.

2.3.9 4600

Chlorine Recovery

2.3.9.1 4610

Residue Oxidation

Anhydrous

chloride mixtures and off-gas streams from Areas 4100 and 4200 are sent through two stages of oxidation at different operating temperatures

to recover Cl2. The first stage operates at 600°C and oxygen is added to promote the oxidation of iron.

39

Natural

gas is used to maintain the operating temperature in the unit due to the heating demand for the vaporization of incoming chloride species.

The gas discharge is sent to the second oxidation stage while the solids generated are separated and disposed.

The

second oxidation stage operates at 1000°C and has excess pure oxygen added to allow for the oxidation of the remaining chloride species.

40

41

42

43

44

The

above oxidation reactions generate significant excess energy. As such, heat integration via a glycol intermediate has been included,

though it would need to be confirmed by vendors. It is proposed that the glycol would be used as cooling medium for the second oxidation

stage. The heated glycol is then used as heating medium for steam generation – decreasing the cooling water demand for the oxidation

stage and energy demand for fresh steam production.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-17

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

The

gas discharge is sent to the Chlorine Quench & Off-Gas Treatment area and the solids generated are separated and disposed.

2.3.9.2 4620

Chlorine Quench & Off-Gas Treatment

The

gas from the Residue Oxidation area is sent through a quenching unit to drop the stream temperature to 50°C. This condenses any water

and hydrochloric acid that may have been produced as a result of organic degradation and other impurity reactions. Other condensable

species are also removed at this stage. The condensed solution is sent to the ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying area for disposal.

The

cooled chlorine gas is compressed and returned to the Carbo-Chlorination area to be used as a chlorinating agent.

2.3.10 5100

Liquid Reagents

Liquid

reagents are delivered to the facility either in metal drums or tanker trucks. Upon arrival, the reagents are unloaded using pumps for

transfer to their respective storage tanks. The storage tanks are specifically designed to safely hold their respective reagents until

needed for various applications within the facility.

2.3.11 5200

Solid Reagents

Iron

powder is delivered to the facility in bulk bags. The bags are lifted to a bag breaker and discharged into a storage hopper for use in

the Al-Sc Hydroxide Recovery area.

Soda

ash is delivered to the facility in bulk bags. The bags are lifted to a bag breaker and discharged into a tank where the solids are mixed

with DI water to produce a 15% soda ash solution. The soda ash solution is passed through a candle filter to remove any undissolved solids.

Solids are collected in a skip and sent to the ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying area for disposal. The filtered soda ash

solution is stored in a tank for distribution within the plant.

Sodium

hydroxide pellets are delivered to the facility in sealed drums. The drums are stored in proximity to the Gallium Separation & Recovery

area and periodically emptied into a storage hopper for distribution. As sodium hydroxide pellets are highly hygroscopic, residence time

in the storage hopper is kept to a minimum to minimize handling concerns.

Flotation

collector is delivered to the facility in bulk bags. The bags are lifted to a bag breaker and discharged into a storage hopper for use

in the Wet Scrubbing area.

2.3.12 5300

Gas Reagents

Chlorine

gas is delivered to site in liquified form. It is unloaded using pumps for transfer to pressurized vessels for distribution to the Carbo-Chlorination

area.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-18

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

An

air separation plant is located on site, in proximity to the processing areas. The separation plant is responsible for producing pure

oxygen and pure nitrogen for use within the plant. The argon residue is to be packaged and sold as a by-product. The capacity of the

air separation plant is based on the oxygen requirement for the process plant. Details regarding the air separation plant are to be provided

by the vendor.

2.4 Process

Model

The

Mass & Energy Balance (MEB) for this study was developed in Kenwalt SysCAD, a plant simulation software, based on steady-state operation.

Brook Mine’s elevation was used to determine the ambient pressure of the model (i.e., 1,210 m elevation leading to 87.6 kPa(a)).

The

mineralogy of the ROM and coal feeds were determined based on test work either conducted by Ramaco or by a third-party laboratory. The

carbon composition of the ROM was assumed to be variable and could be modified based on heating requirements in the ROM roaster unit.

Refer to Section 2.1 or the PDC (H376597-0000-210-210-0001) for additional detail on feed composition.

Reagent

composition and purity level were based on typical supplier specifications. Raw water treatments for plant utilization (i.e., Raw Water

Treatment and DI Water Production Package) were not modeled due to the insufficient information on the well water quality. Other utilities

used were modeled based on the specifications in the PDB (H376597-0000-210-226-0002) and PDC (H376597-0000-210-210-0001).

Physical

and thermodynamic properties for each chemical species within the plant were defined based on available data from HSC (v.6 and v.10),

OLI Studio (v.12.5), NIST chemistry database, and literature. If a species was found to be missing critical information, it was assumed

that it shared properties with a similar species.

Equipment

heat losses, especially in pyrometallurgical units, were not modeled due to insufficient process definition. Any pH parameters were confirmed

using the MSE-SRK database within OLI Studio.

As

limited test work was available for the unit operations within the plant, reaction extents were either based on literature, client data,

or assumptions. Based on client input, overall recovery of gallium and germanium were set to be 94% and 84%, respectively (H376597-0000-210-034-0004).

These recovery extents were achieved by varying the chlorination extents of Ga and Ge in the carbo-chlorination unit. Optimal recovery

was assumed for all subsequent stages. An overview of major product losses is summarized in Table 2-2 below.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-19

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

Table

2-2: Causes for Product Loss in Model.

Location

Affected

Element

Description

Ga

Ge

REE

Sc

Carbo-Chlorination

X

X

X

X

Expected

chlorination of species limit the overall recovery of products.

Crude

Fractional Distillation

X

External

modeling indicated Ge losses due to its low concentration.

Filters

X

X

X

Liquid

elements passed through filters had some losses to the cake moisture.

Additional

information regarding the MEB results are discussed in Section 2.5 below.

2.5 Mass

& Energy Balance

This

section provides a high level summary on the critical mineral deportments and utility recovery. For more information refer to the Stream

Table (H376597-0000-210-216-0002) and the PDC (H376597-0000-210-210-0001).

Values

presented in this section are based on the original HPA production rate of 1,800 metric tonnes per annum (refer to Section 2.1).

2.5.1 Key

Elemental Recoveries

Expanding

on the information summarized in Table 2-2, the overall recovery of the critical minerals as well as Al and Si are summarized below in

Table 2-3.The recovery of Al and Si is intentionally low, since the target HPA and HPS production rates were less than the total amount

of Al and Si chlorinated (see Section 2.1). Therefore portions of the AlCl3 and SiCl4 were sent to the Chlorine

Recovery area to recover Cl2 for the carbo-chlorination unit.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-20

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

Table

2-3: Key Elemental Recovery Overview.

Al

Ga

Ge

Si

Sc

REE

Source

(kg

/ h)

ROM

Feed

14,700

6.06

0.39

47,600

3.40

56.1

REE-Enriched

Coal

119

0.20

0.03

805

0.46

7.82

Destination

HPA

0.8%

-

-

-

-

-

Ga

Metal

-

94%

-

-

-

-

High

Purity GeO2

-

-

84%

-

-

-

HPS

-

-

0.7

%

2%

-

-

Sc2O3

-

-

-

-

79%

-

MREC

-

-

-

-

-

80%

Rejected

Quartz

-

-

-

53%

-

-

Chlorination

Oxide Solids

74.5%

-

7.5

%

22%

-

-

ZLD

Waste

24.7%

6%

7.7

%

22%

21%

20%

In

the carbo-chlorination unit, the reaction extents for Sc and the REEs were assumed to be 80% as insufficient information on the reaction

kinetics was available. For more information, refer to the PDC (H376597-0000-210-210-0001). Unreacted Sc and REE were assumed to not

leach in water and would be sent to Residue Management. Additional Sc losses were due to the Sc SX extraction extent and filtration steps,

bringing the overall recover of Sc to 79%. It was assumed that there were no additional REE losses.

The

reaction extents for Ga and Ge were varied in the carbo-chlorination unit to achieve the target overall recovery of 94% and 84%, respectively

(refer to H376597-0000-210-034-0004). Carbo-chlorination was the main determining factor for Ga recovery, with minor other losses. For

Ge, however, additional losses were tied to the crude fractional distillation where the low Ge concentration led to Ge losses to the

HPS product and Chlorine Recovery waste.

The

overall recovery of Al was dictated by the carbo-chlorination unit kinetics. Aluminum availability was based on kaolinite conversion

to meta-kaolinite in the ROM roaster and coking furnace, limited to 95% in the former. Only meta-kaolinite was then expected to chlorinate

in the carbo-chlorination unit, at an 80% conversion rate. This resulted in un-reacted kaolinite and meta-kaolinite being disposed of

in the Residue Management area. The overall Al recovery as HPA was 0.8%.

The

overall Si recovery was also based on the quartz removal and the carbo-chlorination unit. Quartz removal in the Physical Separation area

decreased the Si feed to the carbo-chlorination units. Only meta-kaolinite-bound Si was expected to be chlorinated and as such the remaining

un-reacted kaolinite, meta-kaolinite, and quartz were disposed in the Residue Management or the Chlorine Recovery areas. The Si recovery

as HPS was intentionally 2%.

All

elemental deportments will need to be confirmed by test work in later phases.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-21

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

2.5.2 Utility

Recovery

Raw

water is planned to be sourced from a well, making its consumption an area of concern. The overall water balance for the plant is summarized

in Table 2-4. Current raw water consumption is at 385.4 t / h. To be noted, the preliminary air separation plant budgetary quote from

Messer indicated a make-up water demand of 200 gpm (~45 t/h) and water waste discharge of 100 gpm (~22.5 t/h) that are excluded from

the values presented in Table 2-4.

Table

2-4: Overall Water Balance for the Brook Mine Process Plant.

Water

Input

Water

Output

Source

Flow

(t / h)

Destination

Flow

(t / h)

Raw

Water

385.4

Cooling

Tower

312.1

ROM

Feed

25.7

ROM

Roaster Off-Gas Treatment Vent

60.1

NaOH

Reagent (50 wt.%)

4.5

Rejected

Quartz Cake

18.4

Coal

Feed

4.0

Waste

ZLD Dryer Vent

11.4

HCl

Reagent (35 wt.%)

1.2

Boiler

9.3

TBP

(99 wt.%)

4.39x10-6

Coking

Off-Gas Treatment Vent

7.4

Waste

ZLD Cake

3.2

Carbo-Chlorination

Off-Gas Treatment Vent

2.2

Other

Outputs

0.1

Total

In

420.8

Total

Out

424.1

Difference

3.26

Water

Generated (in reaction blocks)

3.34

Water

Consumed (in reaction blocks)

0.08

Overall

Difference

0.000

Primary

water losses are due to the cooling tower blowdown, drift and evaporation losses. Standard evaporative cooling tower assumptions were

used in the model and will require confirmation from vendors. Alternative cooling tower technologies may need to be investigated to reduce

these losses. Similarly, boiler water losses are due to pressure let down and boiler blowdown, with the latter requiring confirmation

from vendors.

Other

water losses were from off-gas treatment scrubbers and unrecovered water vapour from calciners, dryers and roasters. Due to the moisture

content in the waste cakes (5 wt.% and 25 wt.% for the rejected quartz and ZLD cake, respectively), additional water is also lost in

those streams. Filtration test work and vendor technology may be able to decrease water losses in cake moisture. The water flowrates

include any bound water that may be present (ex. Al2O3∙2SiO2∙2H2O, [REE]2CO3∙xH2O).

Release or formation of bound water is assumed to not impact water generation/consumption.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-22

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

For

a detailed utilities breakdown on the:

● Process

water consumption, refer to Table 2-5

● DI

water usage, refer to Table 2-6

● Cooling

water usage and return, refer to Table 2-7

● Steam

usage and condensate return, refer to Table 2-8.

2.5.2.1 Process

Water

Process

water is used in the system when the purity is not the primary concern or as alternative cooling medium for high temperature areas. Table

2-5 provides a detailed breakdown and rationale for the major process water users and recovery sources.

Table

2-5: Overview of Process Water Usage and Recovery.

Description

Flow

(t / h)

Addition

Rationale

Process

Water Users

De-Sublimation

1 (Alkali)1

486.2

Maintain

operating temperature at 400°C

Cooling

Tower

312.1

Evaporation/drift/blowdown

losses (6.2%)

De-Sublimation

2 (Ferric Removal)1

231.4

Maintain

operating temperature at 280°C

Mineral

Process Water

108.9

Make

up water loss to purge (2.5%)

Water

Leaching

87.8

40%

solids in feed and 0.5 t / t dry solids wash ratio

Carbo-Chlorination

Off-Gas Treatment

66.5

NaOH

solution diluent used to neutralize SO2 and dissolve HCl

Roaster

Off-Gas Treatment

54.3

NaOH

solution diluent used to neutralize SO2

Coking

Off-Gas Treatment

37.4

NaOH

solution diluent used to neutralize SO2

Al-Sc

Hydroxide Precipitation Filters

0.2

0.5

t/t dry solids

Total

Process Water Usage

1,384.8

Process

Water Recovery

Return

from De-Sublimation 1

486.2

Return

from De-Sublimation 1

Return

from De-Sublimation 2

231.4

Return

from De-Sublimation 2

ZLD

Condensate

225.8

ZLD

Condensate

ROM

Dryer Condensate

47.7

ROM

Dryer Condensate

Water

Evaporator Condensate

39.3

Water

Evaporator Condensate

Total

Process Water Recovered

1,030.5

Make-Up

Raw Water

354.3

Excluding

make-up to DI water package

1 Process

water was used as cooling medium for both the de-sublimation unit 1 and 2 instead of cooling

water due to the high unit operating temperatures.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-23

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

Any

water condensate from the MVR systems (ZLD System and Water Evaporator) is treated as process water and may no longer meet the purity

requirement for the steam boiler, therefore it is treated as process water. Raw water is required to make up the difference in recovered

to usage demand.

2.5.2.2 DI

Water

As

discussed in Section 2.3.2.1, DI water is used when there are concerns about product purity and impurity entrainment. Table 2-6 provides

a detailed breakdown on the DI water usage. The process water make-up flow presented does not account for any waste streams generated

from the DI water treatment package.

Table

2-6: Overview of DI Water Users.

Description

Flow

(t / h)

Addition

Rationale

Boiler

Condensate Make-Up

24.7

Blowdown

losses (5%)

Gallium

Stripping

1.8

O:A

ratio of 20:1

Scandium

Solvent Extraction (Stripping)

1.7

O:A

ratio of 10:1

Scandium

Solvent Extraction (Washing)

1.1

O:A

ratio of 15:1

Other

Users

1.9

Total

DI Water Usage

31.1

Process

Water Make-Up

31.1

DI

water is used in the steam boiler to reduce scaling and in the SX circuits to reduce crud formation. The “Other Users” category

accounts for water consumption for various filtration, dilution, and re-pulping steps necessary for critical mineral production.

2.5.2.3 Cooling

Water

Cooling

water is used throughout the plant to regulate unit operating temperatures and condense vapours. All used cooling water is returned to

the cooling tower and process water is used as make-up source to account for cooling tower losses. A detailed breakdown of the cooling

water usage is summarized below in Table 2-7.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-24

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

Table

2-7: Overview of Cooling Water Users.

Description

Flow

(t / h)

Addition

Rationale

Stage

2 Oxidizer

1311.5

Discharge

temperature of 1000°C

Process

Water Cooler

809.3

Discharge

temperature of 50°C

ROM

Dryer Condenser

528.7

Condense

water present in vent

Al-Ga

De-Sublimator Discharge Cooler

482.0

Discharge

temperature of 55°C

Chlorinated

ROM Cooler

458.1

Discharge

temperature of 100°C

Chlorine

Quench Condenser

332.7

Discharge

temperature of 50°C

Crude

Fractional Distillation Columns

225.3

Maintain

temperature profiles of the two-stage system

Chlorination

Off-Gas Separation Pre-Condenser

170.6

Discharge

temperature of 56.8°C

Al-Ga

De-Sublimator Pre-Cooler

161.0

Discharge

temperature of 150°C

Water

Leach Evaporator Cooler

66.6

Discharge

temperature of 50°C

Hexane

Condenser

44.7

Condense

hexane present in off-gas

Water

Leach Recirculation Cooler

41.8

Maintain

operating temperature of 80°C

SiCl4

Pyrolysis Reactor

32.5

Maintain

operating temperature of 1200°C

Silica

Product Cooler

18.8

Discharge

temperature of 70°C

HCl-Azeotropic

Still

57.2

Maintain

temperature profile (76 - 108°C)

Other

Users

7.3

Total

Cooling Water Usage

4748.3

Make-up

Process Water

312.1

Evaporation/drift/blowdown

losses (6.2%)

Total

Water to Cooling Tower

5060.3

2.5.2.4 Steam

Steam

is used as the heating medium in dryers, distillation columns, and MVR systems. A detailed breakdown of the steam users and condensate

return is summarized in Table 2-8.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-25

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026

Table

2-8: Overview of Steam Usage and Condensate Return.

Steam

Destination

Flow

(t/h)

Addition

Rationale

Steam

Users

ROM

Dryer

62.8

Heat

source to maintain 120°C

Waste

ZLD MVR System

13.4

Make-up

duty source

Crude

Fractional Distillation Columns

11.2

Maintain

temperature profiles of the two-stage system

Boiler

Loss

4.7

Boiler

blowdown loss (5%)

Steam

Condensate Pressure Letdown

4.5

Letdown

pressure to atmospheric

Water

Leach Evaporation MVR System

2.0

Make-up

duty source

Total

Steam Usage

98.7

Condensate

Returns

Condensate

from ROM Dryer

62.8

Condensate

from Crude Fractional Distillation

11.2

Total

Condensate Recovery

74.0

DI

Water Make-Up

24.7

Steam

sent to MVR systems are recovered as process water.

Significant

DI water make up is required due to the condensates from MVR systems not being returned to the boiler. MVR systems combine steam with

process vapour and, as such, the combined condensate no longer meets the purity requirement for boilers. The MVR condensate is instead

used as process water within the plant.

H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0

Page 2-26

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Ramaco

Resources

Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial

Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate

2026-07-28

0

Issued

for Use

D.

Estrada

V.

Tillous

F.

Delgado

Date

Rev.

Status

Prepared

By

Checked

By

Approved

By

Approved

By

Client

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Important

notice to reader

This

report (the “Report”), has been prepared by Hatch Ltd. (“Hatch”) for the sole and exclusive use of Ramaco Resources

(the “Client”) for the purpose of assisting the management of the Client with respect to Brook Mine Rare Earth Project (the

“Asset”) must not be used for any other purpose. Hatch does not accept and disclaimers any and all responsibility and liability

arising from any use or reliance on this Report by any third party, or any modification or misuse of this Report.

1. This

report contains opinions, conclusions and recommendations made by Hatch, using its professional

judgment and reasonable care. Estimates have been prepared by Hatch, using its professional

judgment and exercising due care consistent with the agreed level of accuracy. Any use of

or reliance upon this report and estimate by Client is subject to the following conditions:

a. The

report and estimates being read in the context of and subject to the terms of the Consultant

Service Agreement between Hatch and Ramaco Resources (the “Agreement”), including

any methodologies, procedures, techniques, assumptions and other relevant terms or conditions

that were specified or agreed therein;

b. The

report, including the estimates contained herein, being read as a whole, with sections

or parts hereof read or relied upon in context;

c. The

conditions of the site may change over time (or may have already changed) due to natural

forces or human intervention, and Hatch takes no responsibility for the impact that such

changes may have on the accuracy or validity or the observations, conclusions and recommendations

set out in this report; and

d. The

estimate is based on several factors over which Hatch has no control, including without limitation

site conditions, cost and availability of inputs, etc., and Hatch takes no responsibility

for the impact that changes to these factors may have on the accuracy or validity or this

estimate.

e. This

report is a Scoping Study and, accordingly, all estimates and projections contained herein

are based on limited and incomplete data. Therefore, while the work, results, estimates and

projections herein may be considered to be generally indicative of the nature and quality

of the Project, they are not definitive. No representations or predictions are intended as

to the results of future work, nor can there be any promises that the estimates and projections

in this report will be sustained in future work.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-i

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

2. The

report and estimates are based on information made available to Hatch by the Client or by

certain third parties, and unless stated otherwise in the report, Hatch has not verified

the accuracy, completeness or validity of such information, makes no representation regarding

its accuracy and hereby disclaims any liability in connection therewith.

3. Any

use of this report by any third party is at that party’s sole risk, and neither Hatch

nor any of its directors, officers or employees shall have any liability to any third party

for such use for any reason, including negligence.

4. This

Report is subject to the State of Wyoming and the city of Sherida, Wyoming and all disputes

will be submitted to the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) for resolution

in accordance with its rules then in force. The arbitration will be held in English and in

the city of Sheridan, Wyoming or such other location the parties may agree.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-ii

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Table

of Contents

3.

Capital Cost Estimate Basis

3-1

3.1

Introduction

3-1

3.2

Acronyms and Abbreviations

3-1

3.3

Project and phase description

3-1

3.4

Estimate Summary

3-1

3.4.1

Estimate Summary by WBS

3-1

3.4.2

Summary by Trade

3-3

3.4.3

Accuracy Statement

3-4

3.5

Estimating Tools

3-4

3.5.1

Exclusions, Assumptions and Qualifications

3-4

3.6

Structure & Coding

3-6

3.6.1

Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

3-6

3.6.2

Trade Codes

3-6

3.7

Direct Costs

3-7

3.7.1

Basis by Commodity

3-7

3.7.2

Labor

3-12

3.8

Indirect cost

3-13

3.8.1

Temporary construction facilities and services

3-13

3.8.2

Freight and Logistics

3-14

3.8.3

EPCM

3-14

3.8.4

Spare parts

3-15

3.8.5

Vendor’s representatives at site

3-15

3.8.6

First Fills

3-15

3.8.7

Pre-Operational Testing

3-15

3.9

Owner Costs

3-16

3.10

Contingency

3-16

3.11

OoM estimate for 2.6 MTPA capacity plant

3-17

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-iii

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

List

of Table

Table 3-1:

List of Acronyms

3-1

Table 3-2:

Estimate Summary by WBS level 2

3-2

Table 3-3:

Estimate Summary by Trade

3-3

Table 3-4:

Trade Codes Used

3-6

Table 3-5:

Mechanical equipment and tanks supply  cost

by source of information

3-7

Table 3-6:

Summary of equipment supply by type of equipment

3-8

Table 3-7:

Buildings cost summary

3-9

Table 3-8:

Owner’s Costs summary

3-16

Table 3-9:

Order of Magnitude Estimate for Expansion

3-18

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-iv

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

3. Capital

Cost Estimate Basis

3.1 Introduction

This

document was prepared by the Project Estimating Manager on behalf of the Project Manager.

The

audience for this document includes the Project Owner, Project Manager, Business Unit Owner, and those parties that need to understand

the approach taken to develop the Capital Cost Estimate.

The

purpose of this document is to report the estimate results for the Initial Assessment study phase, the methodology used and the premises

and information taken into account.

3.2 Acronyms

and Abbreviations

The

Table 3-1 below provides a list of acronyms and their corresponding full forms used throughout this document for reference.

Table

3-1: List of Acronyms

Acronym

Full

Form

AACE

Association

for the Advancement of Cost Engineering

BoE

Basis

of Estimate

BoP

Balance

of Plant

USD

United

States Dollars

CAPEX

Capital

Expenditure

CM

Construction

Management

EP

Engineering

and Procurement

MTO

Material

Take-Off

PPE

Personal

Protective Equipment

Q1,

Q2, Q3, Q4

First

Quarter, Second Quarter, Third Quarter, Fourth Quarter

QRA

Quantitative

Risk Assessment

TBD

To

be discussed

WBS

Work

Breakdown Structure

3.3 Project

and phase description

For

project phase and description, please review Section 1 of this report.

3.4 Estimate

Summary

3.4.1 Estimate

Summary by WBS

The table below presents the results of the estimate by physical

and intangible area using the work breakdown structure agreed with Ramaco at level 2.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-1

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Table

3-2: Estimate Summary by WBS level 2

WBS

Code

WBS

description

Total

Cost

(MUSD)

1000

General

- Project Wide

49.56

1100

Site

Preparations

49.56

2000

Site

Preparations and Infrastructure

131.67

2200

Site

Power Distribution

39.32

2300

Fuel,

Steam, Air and Cooling Water Systems

25.18

2400

Water

and Sewage Systems

43.33

2500

Raw

Material, Product and By-product Storage

-

2600

Laboratory

5.00

2700

Non-Process

Buildings

18.84

3000

Beneficiation

294.59

3100

Physical

Separation

130.96

3200

Pre-Treatment

163.63

4000

Process

Plant

791.20

4100

Carbo-Chlorination

237.46

4200

Critical

Mineral Recovery

247.62

4300

Rare

Earth Recovery

77.86

4400

Tailings

Filtration and Storage

-

4500

Residue

Management

200.10

4600

Chlorine

Recovery

20.16

4700

Product

Handling & Packaging

8.00

4900

Process

Building(s)

0.00

5000

Reagents

Storage and Supply

29.48

5100

Liquid

Reagents

4.17

5200

Solid

Reagents

2.28

5300

Gas

Reagents

13.80

5400

Reagents

Unloading Station

3.00

5900

Reagent

Building(s)

-

6000

Offsite

Infrastructure and Facilities (out of Hatch Scope)

-

6100

Site

Access

-

6200

Utilities

-

6300

Accommodations

Camp

-

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-2

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

WBS

Code

WBS

description

Total

Cost

(MUSD)

DC

Direct

Cost

1,296.49

7000

Indirects

440.45

7100

Temporary

Construction Facilities and Services

90.75

7200

Freight

50.99

7300

EPCM

233.37

7400

Miscellaneous

45.89

7500

Pre-Operational

Testing

19.45

DC+IC

Direct

+ Indirect Cost

1,736.94

8000

Contingency

521.08

9000

Owners

Costs

327.02

TIC

Total

Installed Cost

2,585.05

3.4.2 Summary

by Trade

The

summary by trade or discipline applied to the current stage of the project is shown below:

Table

3-3: Estimate Summary by Trade

Code

Trade

Description

Total

Cost

(MCAD)

A

Site

development

49.56

CSE

Structural

support

58.19

F

Buildings

246.76

J

Instrumentation

and controls

59.64

L

Electrical

equipment and bulks

214.53

M

Mechanical

equipment

519.13

N

Tanks

25.65

P

Piping,

fittings, valves and insulation

106.53

X

Multidiscipline

allowances

16.50

DC

Total

Direct Cost

1,296.49

Y

Indirect

Cost

440.45

IC

Total

Project Indirect Costs

440.45

DC+IC

Direct

+ Indirect Cost

1,736.94

Z

Contingency

521.08

V

Owner’s

Costs

327.02

TIC

Total

Installed Cost

2,585.05

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-3

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

3.4.3 Accuracy

Statement

The

capital cost estimate was prepared in accordance with the AACE guidelines for a Scope Study: Class 5 estimate, with an intended accuracy

range of -30% to +50%.

The

estimate is based on very limited information, equipment sizing, and a chosen region but not exact location. Major mechanical equipment

and tanks have been listed and priced. All other costs are factored and derived of the equipment supply cost. More details will be provided

in the following sections.

3.5 Estimating

Tools

The

estimate was produced in MS Excel and delivered in pdf format. A copy of the estimate details and summaries are provided in MS Excel

format.

3.5.1 Exclusions,

Assumptions and Qualifications

The

capital cost estimate was compiled based on the following assumptions and qualifications:

● Discipline

Mechanical equipment list (MEL) for mechanical equipment. Preliminary vendor’s quotes

for key equipment packages, all other equipment was priced according with Hatch in-house

database or using allowances when the capacity of the equipment is indetermined.

● Factored

installation from equipment supply cost according with benchmarks in the region.

● Electrical

equipment and bulks, Piping, insulation, instrumentation and controls, civil and structural

works cost was calculated as allowances, factored consistently with benchmarks for other

projects similar facilities or areas.

● A

preliminary layout was created for the Initial Assessment study, the preliminary size of

buildings and process areas were provided.

● The

indirect costs were introduced as allowances factored from direct cost or equipment supply

cost where applicable.

● The

estimate base date is Q2 2026.

● All

costs are provided in US Dollars; the estimate is presented in US Dollars.

● The

estimate is nominal to the base date and currency. Escalation and currency fluctuations beyond

the base date are excluded.

● None

of the prices is based on contracts of biding quotations.

3.5.1.1 Exclusions

● Given

the non-specific site location of the plant, no information was provided for the excavations

and fills needed to level the surface. For estimation purposes only, the site is assumed

to be levelled. Not massive excavations and fills are considered to provide an even terrain

for construction. This assumption requires review after the location of the plant is defined

and the preparations efforts are quantified.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-4

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

● The

need of deep foundations as piles is excluded. A geotechnical report is being prepared at

the moment. After the results of the geotechnical investigation and recommendations are provided,

this assumption will be reviewed.

● Construction

centralized camp and operation camp have been excluded.

● The

cost of infrastructure and equipment to provide feedstocks, power, fuel, gas, potable and

demineralized water, and reagents outside of the boundary of the project is excluded (Transmission

lines, reagents plant, gas pipeline, etc.). These costs are covered under Owner’s Cost

as indicated by Ramaco.

● The

cost of stack areas and stockpiling facilities is excluded.

● Pre-Commercial

production costs that occur after facilities are handed over to the owner are excluded.

● Sustaining

capital costs and closure costs are excluded (client has indicated that these costs are being

considered in the Financial Model, prepared by Ramaco). The capital cost estimate is limited

to costs relating to project construction and complete pre-operational testing tills hot

commissioning.

● Estimate

is based on EPCM or Design – Bid – Build execution model and excludes any risk

premium or subcontractor’s fees associated with an EPC model.

● Land

purchase and rentals are excluded from Hatch’s scope. This exclusion also considers

the land needed for final disposal of unused material produced from excavations (considered

under Owner’s cost provided by Ramaco).

● Any

cost related to environmental evaluation, permitting and mitigation projects is excluded

(considered under Owner’s Cost provided by Ramaco).

● Financial

costs and Insurances are excluded (considered under Owner’s Cost provided by Ramaco).

● Escalation

beyond the base date.

● Impacts

of foreign currency exchange rate variations are excluded.

● Allowances

for significant changes to the scope of the project are excluded.

● Management

reserves are excluded for risks events not contemplated in contingency such as non-predictable

variations in market conditions that could affect equipment, commodities and / or labour

costs, labour unrest, disputes with residents, geotechnical or process related design issues,

delays due to the considerably late receipt of equipment or materials, significant poor performance

by contractors, force majeure, etc.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-5

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

● Allowances

are excluded for the risks associated with the US political, legal, or regulatory environment,

including:

♦ The

risk of changes to any laws, regulations, rules, or policies, or the governmental or judicial

interpretation thereof

♦ The

risk of the client failing to comply with any such laws, regulations, rules or policies and

the costs of any resulting penalties, fines, suits, etc.

♦ The

risk of the client not being able to obtain or maintain any permits, licenses and other authorisations

required for the project or construction.

● Any

other exclusion stated in this document.

3.6 Structure

& Coding

3.6.1 Work

Breakdown Structure (WBS)

The

WBS is a logical division and sub-division of the work into a 1 to 4-level hierarchical manner. Within the WBS, the Project is divided

into Areas, Facilities, and Sub-facilities or Systems. For the present study only a WBS at level 3 have been developed to identify equipment

in different process areas.

3.6.2 Trade

Codes

Commodity

Codes are used to collect the estimate items into groups of work of a similar nature or discipline. The standard Commodity Code is an

alpha character which is directly aligned with the project standard discipline descriptions.

Table

3-4: Trade Codes Used

Trade

Code

Trade

A

Site

development

CSE

Structural

support

F

Buildings

J

Instrumentation

and controls

L

Electrical

equipment and bulks

M

Mechanical

equipment

N

Tanks

P

Piping,

fittings, valves and insulation

X

Multidiscipline

allowances

Y

Indirect

Costs

Z

Contingency

V

Owner’s

Costs

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-6

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

3.7 Direct

Costs

Direct

costs include all the permanent equipment, materials and labor associated with the physical construction of the permanent facility /

asset, and includes:

● Supply,

assembly, and installation of permanent equipment and tanks

● Supply,

fabrication, and installation of bulk materials

● Supplemental

resources for equipment and bulk material installation, such as labor and construction equipment

● Site

preparations and the construction of ancillary facilities and systems

● Supply,

fabrication and erection of permanent buildings and associated services

● Contractor’s

distributable costs such as mobilization and demobilization, overheads and profit, supervision,

general construction equipment including construction cranes, small tools and consumables

used in construction, etc.

In

the following sections the basis of Direct Cost is explained.

3.7.1 Basis

by Commodity

3.7.1.1 Mechanical

costs

Mechanical

costs consist of permanent equipment, tanks, and the associated labor and material costs required to install them.

A

Mechanical Equipment List (MEL) was provided by engineering including capacity and construction materials when was possible a determination.

This

list was priced using budgetary quotes from vendors, in-house database from recent projects with similar needs. When the capacity was

undetermined an allowance was included according with recent estimate experience.

All

equipment costs of reference from previous projects were escalated to the base date (Q2 2026).

This

is the equipment supply cost distributed according with the source of information:

Table

3-5: Mechanical equipment and tanks supply

cost by source of information

Source

MUSD

%

of total supply

Quote

67.11

18%

Database

253.77

69%

Allowances

47.76

13%

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-7

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

It

was considered that some of the equipment needed to complete the balance of plant is not listed. To cover that cost, a factor between

5% and 10% was applied to the equipment listed cost in each area.

Table

3-6: Summary of equipment supply by type of equipment

Equipment

Total

supply cost MUSD

%

of the total supply cost

Fluid

Bed Roaster

116.07

31%

Crystallizer

Packages

35.07

10%

Cylindrical

Tanks

18.47

5%

Flame

Reactor

17.65

5%

Fluid

Bed Reactors

14.17

4%

Filter

Press

12.69

3%

Cyclones

10.42

3%

Paddle

Coolers

9.56

3%

Heat

Exchanger Coolers

9.28

3%

Water

Treatment Package

7.29

2%

GAC

Columns

7.00

2%

Rotary

Dryers

5.93

2%

Venturi

Scrubbers

5.17

1%

Centrifugal

Pumps

5.15

1%

Evaporator

Package

4.67

1%

Distillation

Columns

4.50

1%

Plate

Magnets

4.00

1%

Mixer

Settlers

3.12

1%

Belt

Conveyors

3.03

1%

De-Sublimators

3.00

1%

Bagging

Systems

3.00

1%

Rotary

Kilns

2.50

1%

Other

listed equipment

35.33

10%

Non-listed

equipment

31.57

9%

The

installation was calculated as a factor of the Equipment cost as follows:

● 30%

factor for Mechanical equipment isolated or non-modular and Tanks

● 15%

factor for modular equipment.

Labor

inclusions are stated in 3.7.2.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-8

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

3.7.1.2 Buildings

and major structures

A

layout and model was developed at the Initial Assessment study phase containing the preliminary footprint of buildings. The size and

conditions per building was provided to estimation and a parametrical calculation of structural steel, concrete, cladding, foundation

excavations and fills, roofing and architectural finishes cost was prepared. The resulting cost per square foot was applied to the buildings

footprint to obtain the their cost.

Table

3-7: Buildings cost summary

Building

/ Structure

Conditions

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Height

(ft)

Total

Cost

(MUSD)

INSTRUMENT

AIR SYSTEM

Warehouse

Structure Building

96

42

32

2.09

STEAM

GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION

Open

structure supporting equipment

96

32

32

1.13

COOLING

WATER SYSTEM

Open

structure supporting equipment

192

96

64

7.38

DEIONIZED

WATER PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

Open

structure supporting equipment

32

32

32

0.38

PROCESS

WATER AND CONDENSATE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

Open

structure supporting equipment

192

192

96

15.30

FIRE

WATER SYSTEM

Open

structure supporting equipment

96

64

64

2.46

GATE

HOUSE

Single

Story Building

64

45

13

0.75

ADMINISTRATION

BUILDING

Single

Story Building

385

80

13

7.93

WAREHOUSE

BUILDING - PARTS/ PRODUCT STORAGE

Warehouse

Structure Building with 5T crane

199

64

26

6.22

MAINTENANCE

SHOP

Warehouse

Structure Building with 5T crane

122

64

26

3.94

STOCKPILE-SURGE

BUILDING-ROM

Warehouse

Structure Building

199

225

71

29.86

STOCKPILE-SURGE

BUILDING-COAL

Warehouse

Structure Building

160

154

51

13.64

WET

SCRUBBING

Open

structure supporting equipment

80

64

32

1.89

FLOTATION

Open

structure supporting equipment

96

112

38

3.54

THICKENING

AND DEWATERING

Open

structure supporting equipment

212

176

64

13.63

MINERAL

PROCESS WATER SYSTEM

Outdoor

tanks

160

96

2.09

DRYING

(KAOLINITE)

Open

structure supporting equipment

64

32

32

0.81

CALCINING

(KAOLINITE)

Open

structure supporting equipment

64

32

64

0.82

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-9

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Building

/ Structure

Conditions

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Height

(ft)

Total

Cost

(MUSD)

ROASTER

OFF-GAS SYSTEM

Open

structure supporting equipment

160

96

160

9.29

COKING

(COAL)

Open

structure supporting equipment

48

32

16

0.44

COKING

OFF-GAS SYSTEM

Open

structure supporting equipment

64

64

160

2.48

CARBO-CHLORINATION

Open

structure supporting equipment

128

96

51

4.68

DE-SUBLIMATION

1 (AKALI SALT REMOVAL)

Open

structure supporting equipment

48

32

64

0.62

DE-SUBLIMATION

2 (FERRIC REMOVAL)

Open

structure supporting equipment

80

48

64

1.54

DE-SUBLIMATION

3 (Al/Ga REMOVAL)

Open

structure supporting equipment

96

64

64

2.46

OFF-GAS

SEPARATION

Open

structure supporting equipment

96

64

64

2.46

GALLIUM

SEPARATION & RECOVERY

Open

structure supporting equipment

96

64

32

2.26

ALUMINA

SEPARATION & RECOVERY

Open

structure supporting equipment

64

64

48

1.51

GERMANIUM

SEPARATION & RECOVERY

Open

structure supporting equipment

32

32

16

0.29

SILICA

SEPARATION & RECOVERY

Open

structure supporting equipment

128

64

48

3.02

WATER

LEACHING

Open

structure supporting equipment

321

128

128

20.74

Al-Sc

HYDROXIDE RECOVERY

Open

structure supporting equipment

96

64

32

2.26

SCANDIUM

SEPARATION

Open

structure supporting equipment

128

32

32

1.51

SCANDIUM

OXIDE PRODUCTION

Open

structure supporting equipment

64

32

16

0.58

RARE

EARTH SEPARATION

Open

structure supporting equipment

96

48

32

1.70

MREC

PRODUCTION

Open

structure supporting equipment

96

64

32

2.26

ZLD

NEUTRALIZATION, EVAPORATION AND DRYING

Open

structure supporting equipment

417

257

96

44.19

n-DODECANE

CRUD GTREATMENT

Open

structure supporting equipment

96

64

64

2.46

Sc

EXTRACTANT CRUD TREAMENT

Open

structure supporting equipment

96

64

64

2.39

RESIDUE

OXIDATION

Open

structure supporting equipment

128

64

64

3.28

REAGENTS

STORAGE AND SUPPLY

Warehouse

Structure Building with 5T crane

199

64

26

6.22

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-10

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Building

/ Structure

Conditions

Length

(ft)

Width

(ft)

Height

(ft)

Total

Cost

(MUSD)

LIQUID

REAGENT STORAGE AND SUPPLY - HYDROXIDE ACID

Outdoor

tanks

32

32

32

0.14

LIQUID

REAGENT STORAGE AND SUPPLY - SODIUM HYDROXIDE

Outdoor

tanks

38

38

38

0.20

LIQUID

REAGENT STORAGE AND SUPPLY - KEROSENE

Outdoor

tanks

16

16

16

0.03

LIQUID

REAGENT STORAGE AND SUPPLY - HEXANE

Outdoor

tanks

26

26

26

0.09

GAS

REAGENT STORAGE AND SUPPLY

Warehouse

Structure Building with 5T crane / To be provided by gas reagent operator - Just foundations needed

513

199

64

13.80

3.7.1.3 Disciplines

cost

All

costs associated to other disciplines apart from Mechanical equipment and process plateworks was factored from the total equipment and

tanks installed cost as follows:

3.7.1.3.1  Site

preparations:

This

cost includes:

● Civil

works needed to prepare the site for the construction (excluded massive excavation and fills,

blasting or any work needed to remove slopes, fill ponds or any considerable unevenness in

the terrain).

● Internal

roads, sidewalks, fences, gates, ponds and exterior lighting.

The

allowance used to cover these works is 10% of Equipment installed cost, in accordance with the cost benchmarked in processing plants

of similar size.

3.7.1.3.2  Equipment

structural support:

Inside

buildings and in the exterior, concrete footings, containment areas, platforms, hangers, handrails, ladders and pipe-racks are needed

to support the equipment and tanks.

To

cover the cost of supports not accounted in the Table 3-7: Buildings cost summary, a factor between 5% to 20% was applied to the equipment

installed cost per area according to Hatch in-house benchmarking.

3.7.1.3.3 Electrical

equipment and bulks:

This

cost includes:

● Supply,

install and testing electrical equipment to distribute power and protections across the plant

● Supply

and install of complete e-houses inside the plant

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-11

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

● Supply

and install of all the power cable, grounding system, lightning protection to distribute

power across the plant

● Supply

and install of All the trays, conduits, duct banks and accessories needed to protect and

support the power cable.

A

factor between 25% and 40% was applied to the equipment installed cost to account for the electrical equipment and bulks cost, according

to Hatch in-house benchmarking.

3.7.1.3.4 Piping

and insulation

This

cost includes:

● Supply

and installation of all the pipelines and pipes inside the plant not included in equipment

packages. Including fittings and special pieces, coating when needed, testing and finishings.

● Supply

and installation of all the flow in-line valves.

● Supply

and installation of all the insulation needed for piping.

A

factor between 10% and 30% was applied to the equipment installed cost to account for the piping and insulation cost, according to Hatch

in-house benchmarking.

3.7.1.3.5 Instrumentation

and controls

This

cost includes:

● Supply

and installation of all the devices need to monitor and control the process, excluded those

that are included in equipment packages

● Supply

and installation of materials needed for the correct functioning of instrumentation, panels,

cable, fiber optic, conduits, etc.

● Supply

and installation of communication and monitoring system, DCS, including CCTV and other circuits

not associated with the process

● Complete

plant programing and integration.

A

factor of 15% was applied to the equipment installed cost to account for the piping and insulation cost.

3.7.2 Labor

The

labor all-in cost is the summary of workforce, construction equipment and contractor’s distributable cost. It represents contractor’s

installation and fabrication rates. In the present estimate the labor was either factored from equipment supply cost or included in general

discipline factors.

The

labor cost includes the following:

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-12

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

● Fully

burdened workforce (including vacations, payroll, benefits, overtime)

● Construction

equipment including operation (rentals, fuel, maintenance, insurances)

● Contractor’s

distributable, or contractor’s indirect costs such us:

♦ Personal

Protection Equipment (PPE) for the direct and indirect workers

♦ Small

tools and consumables

♦ Living

Out Allowance (LOA) for workers coming from locations beyond 60 km from the work site

♦ Supervision

at site

♦ Indirect

support labor

♦ Temporary

trailers and other facilities required

♦ Office

support

♦ HSE

and quality control

♦ Insurances

♦ Overhead

♦ Profit.

Work

regime considered: The work regime to consider must be studied in the following phase, with a clear view of the percentages of workers

coming from Sheridan and other locations.

For

the purpose of the estimate, following the benchmarks used, approximately 50% of the workers are in an extended regime of 10 hrs per

day, 6 days per week (Local labor) and 50% are in an extended regime of 10 hrs per day, 2 weeks on-site and one week of-site.

No

centralized construction camp have been included in the cost.

3.8 Indirect

cost

Indirect

costs were estimated as factored allowances based on historical information from large size projects in North America, adjusted to account

for site specific conditions.

A

description of what is included in the indirect costs is presented below:

3.8.1 Temporary

construction facilities and services

The

cost associated with the temporary facilities covers the following items:

● Construction

area development including temporary diversion ditching, laydown / staging areas, material

borrow quarries and stockpiles, temporary roads, etc.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-13

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

● The

supply and installation of temporary utilities infrastructure such as for water, power, fuel

storage and distribution

● Temporary

buildings, such as, offices and trailers for managing and owner’s team, ablution blocks,

etc.

● Site

office supplies, furniture

● Communications

systems and local area network required to support the site construction activities.

The

cost associated with the temporary construction Services covers the following items:

● Costs

for electrical energy to be used during construction

● Administration,

warehousing, cleaning and maintenance services

● Communications

services (phone and internet) required during construction and

pre-operational testing

● Security

● Water

distribution during construction

● Medical

services (Emergencies and controls)

● Mobile

equipment in warehouses and workshops

● Heavy

lift cranes (not in the scope of contractors).

The

cost of temporary facilities and services have been calculated as 7% of Direct Cost.

3.8.2 Freight

and Logistics

The

Freight and Logistics covers costs for the transportation of equipment (Mechanical, tanks and electrical) from the anticipated market

to the plant site.

A

cost of 10% of equipment supply was included in the estimate to cover the transport, storage and handling of the equipment. This factor

is consistent with a combination of equipment obtained in the country and some packages from other continents. After vendor’s or

region of supply selection a more detailed study can be done.

This

cost of freight does not includes tariffs or duties applied to the equipment import.

3.8.3 EPCM

It

is assumed that equipment supply packages will be grouped as set out in the project execution strategy and that established construction

contractors will be engaged to complete the site work.

The

cost for EPCM services covers the following:

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-14

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

● Preliminary

studies such as Pre-feasibility study, feasibility study and basic engineering.

● Detailed

engineering

● Procurement

of equipment, materials, and contracts

● Construction

management

● Project

controls / reporting

● Project

administration

● Health,

Safety and Environmental requirements

● QA/QC

● Office

expenses, communication, IT services, etc.

● Travel

costs associated with the EPCM team.

The

cost of EPCM was estimated as 15% of the Direct Cost.

3.8.4 Spare

parts

The

equipment spare parts to be used during commissioning and critical spare parts were included in the estimate as 3.5% of equipment supply

cost.

3.8.5 Vendor’s

representatives at site

In

some cases, to fulfil the requirement of equipment manufacturer’s warranties and guarantees, selected manufacturers require their

representatives to complete an inspection of their equipment prior to it being placed into operation.

Cost

for vendor representatives to be on site during construction and/or pre-operational testing, depending on the nature of the equipment

have been included in the estimate as 1.5% of equipment supply cost.

3.8.6 First

Fills

The

cost of common and expected fill consumables to be using during pre-operational testing and commissioning. This cost excludes feedstock

and reagents, and was calculated as 1% of the equipment supply cost.

3.8.7 Pre-Operational

Testing

Costs

for Pre-Operation Testing covers planning and supervision services during commissioning. The team participation will be extended till

hot commissioning, or the moment where the plant is handover to the client to start the ramp-up process.

The

cost of pre-operational testing have been addressed as an allowance of 2% of the Direct Cost.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-15

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

3.9 Owner

Costs

Owner’s

costs were provided by the client. Please see the summary in the Table 3-8.

The

cost of owner’s costs was integrated in the estimate, Owner’s cost contingency was considered imbedded in each cost area.

Table

3-8: Owner’s Costs summary

WBS

MUSD

%

of OC

9110

Owner’s

Project Management

10.20

3.2%

9120

Owner’s

Travel & Expenses

2.50

0.8%

9150

Owner’s

IT/IS Services

1.00

0.3%

9160

Owner’s

3rd Party Consultants

5.00

1.6%

9210

Land

Acquisition

3.75

1.2%

9230

Easement

2.70

0.9%

9300

Legal

& Permitting

11.55

3.7%

9410

Insurance

2.45

0.8%

9710

Project

Support Costs

9.00

2.9%

9900

Exploration

and Mining and Offsite Infrastructure

278.87

84.7%

Total

Owner’s costs

327.02

100%

3.10 Contingency

Contingency

included in the cost estimate is an allowance for normal and expected items of work which must be performed within the defined scope

of work and project execution plan as covered by the cost estimate, but which could not be explicitly foreseen or described at the time

the estimate was completed.

The

contingency amount is an integral part of the cost estimate, and it should be assumed that contingency will be spent in completing the

project. Contingency does not cover significant scope changes, price escalation, currency fluctuations. Contingency does not include

allowances for project “event” risks such as labour unrest, blockades, adverse market conditions, force majeure, or any of

the items that are specifically excluded from the cost estimate.

Typical

uncertainties applicable to contingency:

● Insufficient

information due to incomplete engineering and/or lack of vendor or conditions information

● Equipment

or material costs obtained by ratio or update from historical costs or previous estimates.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-16

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Contingency

allowances have been included as 40% of the sum of the estimated Direct and Indirect costs.

Contingency

= 30% x (Direct Costs + Indirect Costs)

3.11 OoM

estimate for 2.6 MTPA capacity plant

An

Order of Magnitude (OOM) estimate was developed for a different plant capacity using, as a reference the estimate presented above for

a plant capacity of 1.3 MTPA.

The

revised estimate was prepared by identifying and adjusting the areas affected by the change in capacity requirements. Specific areas

were determined to experience cost increases as a result of the new requirements, while other areas remained unchanged.

In

the table below a summary of the estimate is presented showing the factors used:

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-17

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Table

3-9: Order of Magnitude Estimate for Expansion

Area

1.3

MTPA

capacity

(MUSD)

Capacity

factor

2.6

MTPA

capacity

(MUSD)

Site

Development

49.56

1.60

79.29

Site

Power Distribution

39.32

2.00

78.64

Fuel,

Steam, Air and Cooling Water Systems

25.18

1.60

40.28

Water

and Sewage Systems

43.33

1.60

69.33

Laboratory

5.00

1.60

8.00

Non-Process

Buildings

18.84

1.20

22.61

Physical

Separation

66.31

1.60

106.10

Physical

Separation building

64.65

1.50

96.97

Pre-Treatment

149.80

1.60

239.68

Pre-Treatment

building

13.83

1.50

20.75

Carbo-Chlorination

237.46

1.60

379.93

Critical

Mineral Recovery

247.62

1.60

396.19

Rare

Earth Recovery

77.86

1.60

124.58

Residue

Management

151.06

1.60

241.69

Residue

Management building

49.05

1.50

73.57

Chlorine

Recovery

20.16

1.60

32.25

Product

Handling & Packaging

8.00

2.00

16.00

Reagents

Storage and Supply

6.22

1.60

9.96

Liquid

Reagents

4.17

1.60

6.68

Solid

Reagents

2.28

1.60

3.65

Gas

Reagents

13.80

1.60

22.07

Reagents

Unloading Station

3.00

1.60

4.80

Direct

Cost

1,296.49

2,073.03

Indirect

Cost

440.45

704.26

Contingency

521.08

833.19

Owner’s

Cost

327.02

389.67

Total

Cost

2,585.05

4,000.15

Same

base date, currency and exclusions stated in the section 3 are applicable to the estimate.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0

Page 3-18

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Ramaco

Resources

Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial

Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate

2026-07-28

0

Issued

for Use

G.

Law

J.

Gorst

F.

Delgado

Date

Rev.

Status

Prepared

By

Checked

By

Approved

By

Approved

By

Client

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Table

of Contents

4.

Operating Cost

4-1

4.1

OPEX Estimate Summary

4-1

4.1.1

Maintenance Expense

4-2

4.1.2

Reagents Expense

4-2

4.1.3

Energy / Utilities Expense

4-3

4.1.4

Labour Expense

4-5

4.2

OPEX Basis of Estimate

4-7

4.2.1

Reagents

4-7

4.2.2

Consumables

4-8

4.2.3

Energy / Utilities

4-9

4.2.4

Plant Labour

4-10

4.2.5

Maintenance

4-13

4.2.6

General & Administration (G&A)

4-13

4.2.7

Transportation & Logistics

4-13

4.2.8

Allowances & Fees

4-13

4.2.9

Contingency

4-13

4.3

OPEX Case Study – Increased Throughput

4-14

List

of Figures

Figure

4-1: Total OPEX Category Breakdown.

4-2

Figure

4-2: Reagent Annual Cost Breakdown.

4-3

Figure

4-3: Energy / Utilities Annual Cost Breakdown.

4-4

Figure

4-4: Electricity Cost Breakdown per WBS.

4-4

Figure

4-5: Plant Organization Chart.

4-12

List

of Tables

Table 4-1: OPEX

Summary.

4-1

Table 4-2: Plant Labour Count

and Total Compensation.

4-6

Table 4-3: Reagent Unit Cost

and Consumption.

4-8

Table 4-4: Consumable Unit

Cost and Consumption.

4-9

Table 4-5: Utilities Unit

Cost and Consumption.

4-10

Table 4-6: OPEX Comparison

for 2.6M vs. 1.3M tpa ROM.

4-14

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-i

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

4. Operating

Cost

Total

operating cost is summarized in the following section. This estimate has been escalated based on increased HPA production (i.e., from

1,800 to 11,848 mt/y HPA), as per the request of Ramaco (email: “RE: HPA production”, received July 8th, 2026).

For additional information regarding unit price, unit quantity, factors, and salaries, refer to Section 4.2.

4.1 OPEX

Estimate Summary

The

Operating Cost Estimate (OPEX) for the plant is 150.7 M USD. A breakdown of the expenses are shown in Table 4-1 and Figure 4-1 below,

where CMO is the Critical Mineral Oxides equivalent (i.e., rare earth oxides, Sc2O3, GeO2, Ga2O3)

and “Other” includes transportation logistics, allowances, and fees. Contingency and General & Administration (G&A)

have been excluded from the estimate, as per Ramaco’s request.

Table

4-1: OPEX Summary.

Cost

Component

Annual

Operating Cost

(M USD)

Unit

Cost

(USD / mt ROM)

Percentage

of

Total OPEX

Reagents

72.2

55.6

48%

Utilities

23.8

18.3

16%

Consumables

3.2

2.4

2%

Labour

22.0

16.9

15%

Maintenance

17.9

13.8

12%

G&A

-

-

-

Other

11.7

9.1

8%

Total

(excl. contingency)

150.7

116.1

100%

Contingency1

-

-

-

Total

(incl. contingency)

150.7

116.1

100%

1 Per

Ramaco’s request, contingency was excluded from this estimate. Hatch advises on the

inclusion of contingency to account for inherent uncertainties at this level of estimate

maturity.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-1

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Figure

4-1: Total OPEX Category Breakdown.

Major

categories impacting the OPEX are the Maintenance, Reagents, Utilities, and Labour. Additional information regarding each of these categories

is discussed in the sections below.

4.1.1 Maintenance

Expense

Maintenance

expenses account for the costs of maintenance materials and the annual contract works, with the former making up the majority of the

cost (i.e., 94%). The 4% maintenance materials factor was based on typical pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical plants and was applied

to the direct equipment and material costs from the capital cost estimate (CAPEX, H376597-0000-622-624-0001). Maintenance labour is accounted

for in the general labour cost. As the Class 5 CAPEX estimates the equipment cost to be 421 M USD, the maintenance materials cost was

estimated to be approximately 16.9 M USD per annum. See Section 4.2.5 for additional information.

4.1.2 Reagents

Expense

Total

annual reagent cost is 72.2 M USD. A breakdown of cost per reagent is presented in Figure 4-2 below. The “Other” category

includes sodium hydroxide pellets, some organics (kerosene, TBP, PC-88A, n-dodecane), iron powder, soda ash, and flotation frother.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-2

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Figure

4-2: Reagent Annual Cost Breakdown.

Main

contributors to the reagent expense are chlorine gas and sodium hydroxide.

Ramaco

is currently exploring alternative chlorine gas sourcing – i.e., chlorine recovery from PVC waste products – that could potentially

decrease the procurement cost of chlorine gas. The alternative avenue is assumed to decrease the procurement cost to 100 USD per

metric tonne of gas resulting in an annual savings of ~18 M USD. Refer to Section 6 – Project Risks & Opportunities for more

information.

Primary

sodium hydroxide consumption is in the off-gas treatment for the neutralization of SOx species and in waste neutralization. The sodium

hydroxide consumption for waste neutralization could be decreased by recycling HCl-rich waste solutions (such as the Ge decanter waste)

as reagent within the plant. This would save on hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide costs. However, test work is required to ensure

these changes would not contaminate products such as MREC and Sc2O3.

4.1.3 Energy

/ Utilities Expense

Energy

accounts for 16% of the total OPEX. A breakdown of total energy cost per type is shown in Figure 4-3 below. Costs associated with water

and coal consumption were excluded from the diagram as they were assumed to not have any fees, as per RFI 0009 (H376597-0000-210-465-0009).

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-3

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Figure

4-3: Energy / Utilities Annual Cost Breakdown.

As

shown in the above figure, electricity accounts for 97% of the energy cost. A further breakdown of electricity cost per Work Breakdown

Structure (WBS) is shown below in Figure 4-4, where “Allowance” is a fixed 15% factor allocated for HVAC and conveyance needs.

The “Other Areas” includes the following areas and account for minor electrical demand from pumps, agitators, small dryers,

etc.:

Area 3200 – Pre-Treatment

Area 4500 – Residue Management

Area 4100 – Carbo-Chlorination

Area 5100 – Liquid Reagents

Area 4200 – Critical Mineral Recovery

Area 5200 – Solid Reagents

Figure

4-4: Electricity Cost Breakdown per WBS.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-4

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Area

5300 accounts for the majority of electrical demand due to the air separation plant, which based on a preliminary vendor quotation would

require 11.7 MW to operate.

4.1.4 Labour

Expense

Labour

cost to staff the plant during steady-state operation is estimated to be 22 M USD per annum. A breakdown of staff positions, salaries

and annual cost are outlined in Table 4-2, where the position salary accounts for total compensation (inclusive of benefits, pensions,

etc.). See Section 4.2.4 for additional information.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-5

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Table

4-2: Plant Labour Count and Total Compensation.

Staff

Position

No.

of Shift Workers

(# / shift)

No.

of Day Workers

Total

Employees

Position

Salary

(USD / y)

Annual

Cost

(USD / y)

Administration

Operations

Manager

-

1

1

222,000

222,000

Superintendent1

-

1

1

161,000

161,000

Executive

Assistant / Administrative Clerk

-

3

3

63,600

190,800

HR

Specialist

-

-

-

99,800

-

Accountant

-

-

-

116,700

-

Security

2

-

10

55,200

552,000

HSE

/ Training Coordinators

-

2

2

94,100

188,200

Nurse

-

1

1

87,300

87,300

Production

Superintendent

-

1

1

161,000

161,000

General

Foreman2

-

6

6

127,800

766,800

Shift

Foreman2

6

-

30

120,400

3,612,000

Plant

Operators2

15

-

75

98,767

7,407,500

Controls

Control

Room Supervisor

-

1

1

127,800

127,800

Control

Room Operators

4

-

20

117,700

2,354,000

Engineers

Chief

Process Engineer

-

1

1

175,500

175,500

Process

Control Engineer

-

2

2

164,600

329,200

Process

Engineer2

-

5

5

159,100

795,500

Laboratory

Chief

Assayer

-

1

1

127,200

127,200

Assayer

2

-

10

75,600

756,000

Maintenance

Superintendent

-

1

1

161,000

161,000

Foreman

1

-

5

120,400

602,000

Planner

-

1

1

120,400

120,400

Clerk

-

1

1

63,600

63,600

Millwrights

/ Tradesman

2

-

10

91,600

916,000

Welder

/ Fabricator

-

6

6

115,100

690,600

Machinist

-

2

2

98,100

196,200

Electrician

1

-

5

103,300

516,500

Instrument

Technician

1

-

5

126,800

634,000

Serviceman

/ Tool Crib Attendant

-

1

1

58,200

58,200

1 Positions

that may be shared with the Brook Mine facilities.

2 These

positions are distributed in different process areas. The number presented is the sum required

for the overall plant.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-6

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

4.2 OPEX

Basis of Estimate

The

OPEX is based on a typical steady-state operating year after ramp-up. The following parameters were used to estimate the costs associated

with plant operation:

● The

currency is based on US dollars with a base rate of Q1 2026.

● The

intended accuracy is consistent with a conceptual study level definition.

● All

costs are exclusive of taxes or duties.

● No

forward escalation was included.

● Feed

and product transport costs are excluded.

● No

consideration is given to long term variation or averages for reagent / utility pricing or

labour costs.

● No

allowance for overhead costs is considered in this estimate.

● At

Ramaco’s request, contingency has been excluded from this OPEX, and no allowance for

unknown risks is included. As a result, the estimate carries an increased level of cost uncertainty

and associated risk.

The

estimate covers all costs expected during standard operation including:

Reagents & Consumables

General & Administration (G&A)

Energy / Utilities

Transportation & Logistics

Plant Labour

Allowances & Fees

Maintenance

The

calculation methodology applied for each section of the OPEX is summarized below. Detailed estimate information, including major inputs,

can be found in the OPEX estimate (H376597-0000-622-624-0001).

4.2.1 Reagents

Reagent

unit rates were either provided by Ramaco or Hatch’s internal database based on prior vendor quotations. Consumption rates were

calculated based on the Mass & Energy Balance (MEB) Stream Table (H376597-0000-210-216-0002, Rev. G). An allowance (5 vol.%)

was included for annual replacement of organic solutions to account for expected degradation during operation. A breakdown of the reagent

unit costs and consumptions is provided in Table 4-3 below.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-7

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Table

4-3: Reagent Unit Cost and Consumption.

Reagent

Unit

Cost

Unit

Consumption

Unit

Cost Source

Hydrochloric

Acid (35 wt.%)

360

USD

/ mt

1.9

mt

/ h

Hatch

in-house budgetary quote.

Sodium

Hydroxide (50 wt.%)

424

USD

/ mt

8.9

mt

/ h

"

Sodium

Hydroxide (Pellets)

855

USD

/ mt

3.4

kg

/ h

"

Kerosene

2,055

USD

/ mt

5.91

kg

/ h

"

TBP

8,095

USD

/ mt

0.51

kg

/ h

"

PC-88A

9,256

USD

/ mt

1.31

kg

/ h

"

n-Dodecane

600

USD

/ mt

13.91

kg

/ h

Client

response to RFI 0009. Received May 27, 2026.

Hexane

1,066

USD

/ mt

562.3

kg

/ h

Hatch

in-house budgetary quote.

Iron

Powder

1,680

USD

/ mt

16.5

kg

/ h

"

Soda

Ash

530

USD

/ mt

67.7

kg

/ h

"

Flotation

Collector

5,720

USD

/ mt

31.8

kg

/ h

"

Flotation

Frother

2,650

USD

/ mt

3.2

kg

/ h

"

Chlorine

Gas

300

USD

/ mt

11.1

mt

/ h

Client

email: “PVC and E-waste opportunity statements”. Received May 29, 2026.

1 These

unit consumptions account for the annual replacement allowance factored on an hourly basis.

4.2.2 Consumables

General

consumables considered in the OPEX include product packaging materials (bulk bags, drums, etc.), filter cloths, polish filter socks,

and pallets. Non-quantified consumables are accounted for as part of a General Consumables allowance (see Section 4.2.8).

The

unit cost of product packaging materials were either sourced from vendors or provided by Ramaco. Consumption rates for product packaging

were based on the maximum allowable volume or weight for a given item. A cost allowance per filtration area was allocated to the filter

cloths and polish filter socks based on in-house data. Filter cloth demand was based on preliminary equipment sizing of filter presses

and candle filters. A breakdown of consumable unit cost and consumption is shown below.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-8

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Table

4-4: Consumable Unit Cost and Consumption.

Consumable

Unit

Cost

Unit

Consumption

Unit

Cost Source

Fiber

Drums

68

USD

/ drum

13,721

drums

/ y

Uline

Fiber Drums, 55 gallons.

Plastic

Bottles

2.90

USD

/ bottle

2,118

bottles

/ y

Uline

EZ-Pour F-Style Jugs

Bulk

Bags

9.99

USD

/ bag

15,012

bags

/ y

Palmetto

Industries Bulk Bags (FIBC) - Duffle Top, Flat Bottom, 35” x 35” x 40” .

Pallets

55

USD

/ pallet

18,442

pallets

/ y

Uline

New Wood Pallets, Heat-Treated Export. 48” x 48".

Filter

Cloth1

75

USD

/ m2

7,851

m2

/ y

Allowance

1 This

cost includes material and installation.

Hatch

assumed that fiber drums would be used to package GeO2, MREC, and Sc2O3, while plastic bottles would

be used for liquid gallium metal and bulk bags would be used for Al2O3 and SiO2. Pallets are assumed

to be used for the transportation of fiber drums and bulk bags, with each pallet carrying either 4 drums or 1 bulk bag.

4.2.3 Energy

/ Utilities

This

section considers costs associated with energy consumption from local grids, natural gas, coal, and diesel as well as any associated

costs with water consumption.

Energy

consumption was calculated based on preliminary sizing of major equipment. Unit costs were either provided by Ramaco or based on recent

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) data. A miscellaneous power consumption factor (15%) on the total power requirement has

been included to account for HVAC and conveyance demand. An diesel allowance of 200 L / day was allocated for all non-electric vehicles

(i.e., forklifts, utility vehicles, etc.).

Water

consumption was calculated based on the MEB Stream Table and Staffing Plan. A potable water allowance (300 L / person / day) has been

included based on prior Hatch experience. As per the client response to RFI 0009 (H376597-0000-210-465-0009), no consumption cost is

associated with water as it is being pumped from a local well.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-9

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Table

4-5: Utilities Unit Cost and Consumption.

Utilities

Unit

Cost

Unit

Consumption

Unit

Cost Source

Water

Raw

Water

-

USD

/ m3

387

m3

/ h

Client

response to RFI 0009.

Potable

Water

-

USD

/ m3

300

L

/ person / day

"

DI

Water

-

USD

/ m3

31

m3

/ h

"

Electricity

Consumption

94.0

USD

/ MW

30.4

MW

Client

email: “Operating Cost Estimate – Client Comments”. Received July 9, 2026.

Connection

-

USD

/ MW

-

-

Client

response to RFI 0009.

Other

Natural

Gas

1.30

USD

/ MW

66.4

MW

U.S.

Energy Information Administration. Converted from cubic feet.

Diesel

0.94

USD

/ L

200

L

/ day

"

Coal

-

USD

/ mt

29.3

mt

/ h

Client

response to RFI 0009.

4.2.4 Plant

Labour

The

staffing plan and labour rates from the previous conceptual study were used as basis for this phase.

Staffing

was divided into three main groups: production, maintenance, and administration. Production was further broken down into the following

six subgroups, based on the WBS:

● Area

2300, 2400, 4700, 5000 – Reagents, Utilities & Product Storage

● Area

3100 – Physical Separation

● Area

3200 – ROM Drying & Roasting, Coal Coking

● Area

4100, 4220, 4240, 4600 – Carbo-Chlorination & Pyrolysis

● Area

4210, 4230 – Gallium & Germanium Recovery

● Area

4300 – Water Leach, REE & Scandium Recovery.

Each

production area was assigned a general manager (i.e., general foreman), a shift foreman, and a series of operators. Number of operators

per area was based on process complexity and expected operator workload. With the exception of the Reagents, Utilities & Product

Storage area, a process engineer was also assigned to each area.

Within

the administrative group, some positions have been highlighted as optional for this facility. The HR specialist and accountant are assumed

to be shared with the existing Brook Mine facility, as such their salaries were excluded from this estimate. The nurse is assumed to

solely be a day position due to the plant’s proximity to the local hospital. The administration superintendent is currently assumed

to be a day position but there is the potential for the role to be shared with the other Brook Mine facility and removed from this estimate.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-10

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Shifts

were defined as 12-hour shifts with an expected roster of two day shifts and two night shifts followed by four days off. Five workers

would be required to cover one shift work position, accounting for leave and illness.

The

labour plant is outlined in Figure 4-5 below, where the administrative superintendent has been highlighted as an optional position that

could be shared with the Brook Mine staff. The HR specialist and accountant have excluded based on assumptions listed above.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-11

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

Figure

4-5: Plant Organization Chart.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-12

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

4.2.5 Maintenance

An

allocation for maintenance material expenses was included in the OPEX. Maintenance materials costs were factored based on the CAPEX mechanical

and material cost. A factor of 4% was used for the plant based on typical plants (pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical) and due to

the high temperatures, and chlorine corrosion risks. This factor does not include maintenance labour, which is captured in the labour

cost.

An

annual contract work allowance was added in case of additional maintenance expenses. An allowance of 1 million USD per year was included.

4.2.6 General

& Administration (G&A)

Administrative

expenses costs include, and are not limited to, software licenses, business travel, training, etc. As per Ramaco’s request, G&A

has been excluded from the OPEX as the expenses will be account for by the Owner.

4.2.7 Transportation

& Logistics

A

residue handling & off-site transportation fee of 1 USD / mt was included for the disposal of rejected quartz, ZLD waste, Chlorine

Recovery (Area 4600) waste and crud waste outside of the plant site. This includes transportation of the waste to a dry stacking area.

Costs

for final product outbound logistics were excluded in this study.

4.2.8 Allowances

& Fees

General

consumables allowance was factored based on the total OPEX excluding contingency. This cost accounts for non-quantified reagents (ex.

cooling tower reagents) and consumables (ex. ceramic filters). A factor of 0.5% was used for the plant.

Equipment

facility fees have been included for the air separation plant based on the preliminary vendor quotation from Messer as part of their

Build, Own & Operate program.

4.2.9 Contingency

At

Ramaco’s request, contingency has been excluded from this OPEX, and no allowance for unknown risks is included. As a result, the

estimate carries an increased level of cost uncertainty and associated risks.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-13

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026

4.3 OPEX

Case Study – Increased Throughput

The

following table summarizes an order-of-magnitude OPEX based on an increased ROM throughput (i.e., from 1.3 to 2.6 million dry tonnes

per annum), in comparison with the original throughput of 1.3Mtpa ROM.

Table

4-6: OPEX Comparison for 2.6M vs. 1.3M tpa ROM.

Cost

Component

2.6

Mtpa ROM

1.3

Mtpa ROM

Annual

Operating Cost

Unit

Cost

Annual

Operating Cost

Unit

Cost

(M

USD)

(USD

/ mt ROM)

(M

USD)

(USD

/ mt ROM)

Reagents

144.3

55.5

72.2

55.6

Utilities

47.5

18.3

23.8

18.3

Consumables

6.3

2.4

3.2

2.4

Labour

22

8.5

22

16.9

Maintenance

29.9

11.5

17.9

13.8

G&A

-

-

-

-

Other

23.4

9.0

11.7

9.1

Total

(excl. contingency)

273.4

105.2

150.7

116.1

Contingency1

-

-

-

-

Total

(incl. contingency)

273.4

105.2

150.7

116.1

1 Per

Ramaco’s request, contingency was excluded from this estimate. Hatch advises on the

inclusion of contingency to account for inherent uncertainties at this level of estimate

maturity.

The

cost components were costed as per the Basis of Estimate and scaled accordingly based on the increased ROM throughput. The following

exceptions were made for the order-of-magnitude estimate:

● The

staffing plan was assumed to be unchanged.

● Daily

allowances (ex. Diesel, potable water) were assumed unchanged.

● Maintenance

material allowance was based on the direct mechanical equipment & material cost, escalated

using the 6/10th rule.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0

Page 4-14

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

Ramaco

Resources

Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial

Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution

Strategy and Schedule

2026-07-28

0

Issued

for Use

F.

Delgado

C.

D’Cunha

J.

Gorst

Date

Rev.

Status

Prepared

By

Checked

By

Approved

By

Approved

By

Client

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

Table

of Contents

5.

Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule

5-1

5.1

Engineering Development

5-1

5.1.1

Scoping Study

5-1

5.1.2

Pre-Feasibility Study

5-1

5.1.3

Feasibility Study (FS)

5-2

5.1.4

Basic Engineering/FEED

5-3

5.2

Conceptual Plot Plan

5-4

5.2.1

Site Constraints

5-4

5.2.2

Site Laydown and/or Expansion

5-5

5.2.3

1110 – Site Access Roads

5-6

5.2.4

1210 – Electrical Power Supply

5-7

5.2.5

1220 – Raw Water Supply

5-7

5.2.6

2120 – Roads and Stormwater Management

5-7

5.2.7

2130 – Stormwater Ponds

5-7

5.2.8

2210 – Main Substation

5-8

5.2.9

2710 – Gatehouse Building

5-9

5.2.10

2720 – Administration Building

5-9

5.2.11

2750 – Maintenance Building

5-10

5.2.12

2750 – Warehouse – Parts and Products

5-10

5.2.13

3120 – Grade Benches for Crushing Circuit

5-11

5.3

Procurement Strategy

5-12

5.4

Permitting

5-14

5.5

Execution Schedule

5-14

List of Figures

Figure 5-1:

Plot Boundaries.

5-5

Figure 5-2:

Laydown / Expansion Areas.

5-5

Figure 5-3:

General Plant Access Road.

5-6

Figure 5-4:

Haul Truck Access Point.

5-6

Figure 5-5:

Tie-in To Electrical Grid.

5-7

Figure 5-6:

Pond Arrangements.

5-8

Figure 5-7:

Electrical Switchyard.

5-8

Figure 5-8:

Gatehouse.

5-9

Figure 5-9:

Administration Building.

5-10

Figure 5-10:

Maintenance Building.

5-10

Figure 5-11:

Product Storage Building.

5-11

Figure 5-12:

Grade Benches for Crushing Circuit.

5-12

Figure 5-13:

ROM / Coal Stockpiles and Reclaim.

5-12

List of Tables

Table 5-1:

Major Equipment Supply Contracts.

5-13

Table 5-2:

Major Construction Contracts.

5-13

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-i

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

5. Preliminary

Execution Strategy and Schedule

A

high-level strategy and schedule for executing the Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project has been developed, including:

● Identifying

phases of engineering development.

● Identifying

critical equipment supply packages.

● Presenting

a level 1 schedule for executing the project and discussing opportunities and risks of the

different flowsheet options.

5.1 Engineering

Development

The

following subsections discuss the assumed program for engineering development. A staged project delivery model is recommended as indicated

in the following subsections. The novel nature of the process necessitates a rigorous engineering development program.

5.1.1 Initial

Assessment Study

The

initial Assessment Study study was completed by a small team, primarily consisting of process engineers. The objective of the scoping

phase was to advance understanding of the process options in preparation for the Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS, Option Selection) phase.

It is expected the pre-feasibility study will be completed in parallel to metallurgical test work.

Initial

Assessment study tasks include:

● Developing

the process design criteria (PDC) including incorporating available test data.

● Developing

block flow diagrams (BFD) and preliminary mass-energy balances (MEB).

● Developing

a conceptual level plot plan for each option.

● Identify

major utility requirements including power supply, water supply, etc.

● Develop

capital estimates according to AACE Class 5 guidelines and operating cost estimates.

5.1.2 Pre-Feasibility

Study

The

objective of the Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) is to advance the flowsheet options based on test work data and then to select the preferred

option to use as the basis of the Feasibility Study (FS) phase. The PFS team will consist mostly of process engineers supported by some

discipline engineers and cost estimators.

PFS

tasks include:

● For

each option:

♦ Advancing

process deliverables such as the PDC and MEB, and developing process flow diagrams (PFDs).

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-1

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

♦ Advancing

the plot plan.

♦ Obtaining

budget quotes for the supply of major equipment.

♦ Generating

capital cost estimates according to AACE Class 4 (-/+30%) guidelines and operating cost estimates.

♦ Assessing

environmental considerations.

♦ Developing

a level 2 project execution schedule.

● Completion

of a preliminary geotechnical investigation. As required, the sites will be assessed and

the information is to be incorporated in engineering development.

● Selection

of a preferred process option.

● Developing

a workplan for the FS phase of the project.

The

PFS phase is expected to take 9–11 months to complete.

5.1.3 Feasibility

Study (FS)

The

main objective of the FS is to develop, for the selected process option, the project definition sufficiently to support an economic decision.

The FS team will include process engineers, discipline engineers, planners, and estimators.

Tasks

required to meet this objective include:

● Advancing

the process deliverables including the PDC, PFDs and MEB. Available test data to be incorporated

when possible.

● Completing

applicable (secondary) trade-off studies to establish the plant configuration and to minimize

the project’s carbon footprint.

● Completing

a feasibility level geotechnical investigation to support the feasibility study designs.

● Developing

Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams.

● Developing

a 3D model of the facility and associated site plans.

● Development

of Functional Descriptions including Control and Operating Philosophy.

● Supporting

the permitting effort including providing emissions inventory data.

● Progressing

discipline engineering to FS level including discipline design criteria, mechanical equipment

list, high-level piping & instrument diagrams (P&IDs), single line diagrams (SLDs),

process control architectural diagrams, and IO lists.

● Completing

a preliminary Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP).

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-2

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

● Preparing

detailed technical specifications for major equipment supply packages and issuing to vendors

for multiple budgetary proposals to support the CAPEX and project execution schedule.

● Preparing

a project execution strategy and level 3 schedule.

● Developing

a capital cost estimate as per AACE Class 3 guidelines with an intended accuracy of +/- 15%.

High-level material take-offs (MTOs) will be developed for all disciplines (for example,

concrete MTOs will be developed based on building footprints with consideration for equipment

loads and geotechnical conditions, structural steel MTOs will be generated based on building

volumes and in-house data).

● Developing

an operating cost estimate with an intended accuracy of +/- 15%.

● Completing

a project risk review workshop.

● Developing

the FS final report.

The

FS will be used by Ramaco in support of its internal project gate review program to secure approval and funding for the project.

5.1.4 Basic

Engineering/FEED

The

objective of the Basic Engineering/FEED phase will be to prepare the project to proceed with full execution. Home office engineering

and procurement teams would ramp-up in preparation for EPCM.

Assumed

Basic Engineering/FEED tasks include the following:

● Developing

commercial documents to support issuing requests for proposals to vendors and contractors.

● Issuing

RFPs for critical equipment supply packages, obtaining firm price bids and completing bid

clarifications, evaluations, and recommendations in preparation for award.

● Completing

a geotechnical investigation to support detailed engineering.

● Developing

and firm price bid packages for the supply of other major equipment, obtaining multiple bids,

complete clarifications, bid evaluations and recommendations for award.

● Updating

the 3D model to incorporate available vendor data and input from the preliminary HAZOP.

● Developing

Site Preparations and Early Work contract documents and issuing to contractors to obtain

firm price bids. Complete bid clarifications and evaluations in preparation to award.

● Developing

a detailed project execution plan and schedule.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-3

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

● Developing

the Project Procedures Manual (PPM).

● Re-estimating

the project CAPEX.

● Generating

the “project control documents” (CAPEX and schedule).

5.2 Conceptual

Plot Plan

Ramaco

provided Hatch with a suggested location for the commercial plant site. This location took into consideration the local topography, existing

road layout, property boundary line as well as permit area. Hatch has developed the layout with the assumption that grading will be carried

out by Ramaco to provide a level site for the main plant, with appropriate benches to accommodate the crushing circuit.

See

drawings H376597-0000-203-290-0001 & 0002 for Site Plan and Plot Plan. Some key aspects of the layout are discussed on the following

pages.

5.2.1 Site

Constraints

The

site area has 4 general constraints:

A. West

Side – Existing county roads and private road and Ramaco’s property line

B. North

Side – Ramaco property line / Permit area

C. East

side – Existing creek

D. South

Side – Existing Interstate Highway

Hatch

was advised to locate the plant at least 500 ft from the property and road constraints. Hatch placed the fenceline ~500 ft from the west

side roads. During the project model review, Ramaco advised that there is leased area and it prefers all plant entities, including parking

lots to reside on owned real property. This lot boundary was subsequently added to the layout, which highlights the fact that the proposed

parking locations straddle the boundary between owned and leased property. A layout modification to relocate the parking areas within

the owned property will be facilitated in the next project phase. Refer to. Refer to Figure 5-1.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-4

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

Figure

5-1: Plot Boundaries.

5.2.2 Site

Laydown and/or Expansion

Areas

for plant operations laydown have been situated within the current layout. These areas may be utilized, in part, for expansion purposes.

Note, that it is always advisable to allow for permanent laydown areas to facilitate efficient plant operations. Refer to Figure 5-2

for areas marked for these purposes.

Figure

5-2: Laydown / Expansion Areas.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-5

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

5.2.3 1110

– Site Access Roads

Access

for road vehicles has been provided along the existing Coal Bank Rd. One access road is south of the plant, while the other is across

from the existing Slater Creek Rd. Both of these access points are south of the existing private road, South Ash Creek Rd. See

Figure 5-3 below.

Figure

5-3: General Plant Access Road.

It

is common practice to separate haul truck traffic from road traffic for practicality and safety purposes. For the current layout, the

approach taken is to have a separate haul truck access point to a raised bench within the site, allowing for a rear dump station to the

primary crushing circuit for both ROM and Coal feeds. It is assumed that Ramaco will grade local roads to ensure access at this elevation

meets acceptable grade inclines for safe operation of the haul trucks. Refer to Figure 5-4.

Figure

5-4: Haul Truck Access Point.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-6

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

5.2.4 1210

– Electrical Power Supply

It

is assumed that there will be an electrical tie-in from south of the existing interstate highway, running north to the south west corner

of the plant. See Figure 5-5.

Figure

5-5: Tie-in To Electrical Grid.

5.2.5 1220

– Raw Water Supply

It

is the assumption that raw water will be accessible to the site by means of locally drilled wells.

5.2.6 2120

– Roads and Stormwater Management

The

site roads have been laid out with 13 ft wide lanes, along with 4 ft wide shoulders. The road layout can accommodate 40 ft truck trailers

(60 ft minimum road radius for main plant roads). There is an allowance for 40 ft easements from a building/structure to the edge of

road shoulders, which allows for space for buried services, e.g. firewater lines, and/or drainage systems, e.g. stormwater ditches. An

allowance of 10ft clearances adjacent to the road shoulders has been included for these utility/drainage purposes (allowance to be verified

in the next phases of the project).

5.2.7 2130

– Stormwater Ponds

For

the current project phase, the layout has provision for three stormwater ponds for surface water runoff requirements across the site.

The ponds’ location take advantage of natural topographical runoff valleys. Refer to Figure 5-6.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-7

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

Figure

5-6: Pond Arrangements.

5.2.8 2210

– Main Substation

The

electrical switchyard is located in the Southwest quadrant of the plot. It is separated from the plant by an interior fence, allowing

access from the west by the local utility corporation, and from the east by plant personnel. Refer to Figure 5-7.

Figure

5-7: Electrical Switchyard.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-8

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

5.2.9 2710

– Gatehouse Building

A

gatehouse is located at the west entrance of the plant to validate deliveries and monitor incoming and outgoing trucks. Gatehouse personnel

can direct incoming vehicles to staging, the truck scale or through to the main plant area. This scale is dedicated to a lane that runs

adjacent to a bypass lane, as some trucks do not need to be weighed before entering the plant. For vehicles transporting materials and

feedstock into the facility, an accurate record must be made of their payload. As such, a truck scale has been included with a clear

view to the gatehouse. Refer to Figure 5-8. In addition, the gatehouse will serve as the first entry point for visitors and staff. Alternatively

the general staff could enter through to the administration building by means of a controlled turnstile through the perimeter fence.

Figure

5-8: Gatehouse.

5.2.10 2720

– Administration Building

The

administration building is the primary building which houses the largest contingent of operations personnel. It is located on the

west end of the plot, adjacent to both the employee parking area and the employee entrance gate and thus allows for swift evacuation

out of the plant area in the event of an emergency. The Administration Building consists of a single-story building on grade and would

be fully finished with heating and air conditioning systems. Floor plans have not yet been developed but the layout area assumes inclusion

of a control room, change rooms, laboratory, lunch room, medical room, meeting rooms, offices, security office, training room, and washrooms.

Refer to Figure 5-9.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-9

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

Figure

5-9: Administration Building.

5.2.11 2750

– Maintenance Building

A

Maintenance Building is also included, adjacent to the administration building, for general maintenance to be performed on plant equipment,

as well as select mobile equipment such as forklifts and small trucks. The building has space allocation for parts storage, two washrooms

and an office. The building is on the west side of the truck yard, across from the warehouse, which allows for efficient retrieval of

additional spare parts from stores. There are 4 vehicle access doors to accommodate road vehicles, forklifts or bobcats, and a 20 ft

flatbed truck for delivery of larger equipment such as agitator assemblies. An overhead crane will be installed to allow for equipment

to be loaded off and onto a truck. Refer to Figure 5-10.

Figure

5-10: Maintenance Building.

5.2.12 2750

– Warehouse – Parts and Products

A

warehouse is included in the west half of the plant. This building would house end products, general supplies and general equipment spare

parts on steel racking allowing for 3 pallets high of storage (to allow a general forklift to handle warehouse operations). Should the

building be required to increase the storage capacity, the plant layout can be modified in the next project phase to extend the footprint

to suit. An option would be to increase the building height to accommodate taller racking, however, that would necessitate using reach

trucks to lift loads to higher levels.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-10

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

The

building has been designed with two grade level loading bays (via ramp) to accommodate hard side containers with rear door loading. In

addition, there is a drive-in bay to permit loading/unloading of a 20 ft flatbed trailer by means of an overhead crane. The 20 ft flatbed

truck can then distribute materials throughout the site. A washroom has been included within the layout for the building. Refer to Figure

5-11.

Figure

5-11: Product Storage Building.

5.2.13 3120

– Grade Benches for Crushing Circuit

The

inclusion of a crushing circuit requires a difference in elevations to permit a gravity fed crusher feed system. This arrangement often

utilizes the local topography to establish an elevated bench for the haul trucks to dump loads into a feed bin/hopper.

Downstream

of this primary stage crushing, are either secondary crushers or transfer stations (if required). The crushed material is then conveyed

to a crushed stockpile (within an enclosed building for environmental purposes). From there, a reclaim system is utilized to provide

a constant feed to the process. Two options were considered for the reclaim system:

(1)

Front end loader transfer from stockpile to feed hopper along conveyor, or

(2)

Subterrain reclaim feeder along with tunnel.

For

the purposes of this project phase, Ramaco suggested that we consider a below ground feeder arrangement which requires a tunnel below

the stockpiles. In order to establish a shallow angle on the transfer conveyor, an elevated bench was considered to minimize the overall

circuit footprint, i.e. having the stockpile buildings on the same grade elevation as the main plant would require a greater distance

between the receiving process equipment and the stockpiles due to the maximum angle of the conveyor arrangement. Refer to Figures Figure

5-12 and Figure 5-13.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-11

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

Figure

5-12: Grade Benches for Crushing Circuit.

Figure

5-13: ROM / Coal Stockpiles and Reclaim.

5.3 Procurement

Strategy

An

Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management (EPCM) execution strategy is assumed for the project.

Major

process equipment supply packages, and assumed vendor post-award design and fabrication durations, are listed in Table 5-1. Durations

are assumed based on experience from previous projects. Note that equipment supply durations may vary considerably due to recent supply

chain disruptions.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-12

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

Table

5-1: Major Equipment Supply Contracts.

Package

Title

Lead

Time (in weeks)

Large

Transformers

110

Fluid

Bed Calciners

77

Solvent

Extraction

69

Filter

Presses

52

Evaporators

and Crystallizers

52

Baghouses

48

Scrubbers

40

Cooling

Towers

40

A

list of assumed major construction contracts are highlighted in Table 5-2. At this stage of project development, it is assumed that the

construction contracting strategy will not change significantly between process flowsheet options, with only the scope and size of the

major contracts changing.

Table

5-2: Major Construction Contracts.

Package

No.

Package

Title

Remarks

Type

Category

Sequence

EPC

CONTRACTS - Design, Supply & Install

T

A

001

Administration

Building, Laboratory, Gate House. Includes lighting, HVAC, finishes, utilities, and furniture.

It

is assumed that these buildings are physically separated from other structures.

Fixed

Price. Excludes foundations

T

A

002

Process

Buildings.

Conceptual

layout to be developed during FS including equipment loading information.

Fixed

Price. Excludes foundations

T

A

003

Warehouses

and Maintenance Shop including HVAC, lighting, utility distribution and overhead crane (in maintenance shop).

Fixed

Price. Excludes foundations

CONSTRUCTION

CONTRACTS

C

A

001

Site

Development, Grading, Plant Roads, Drainage, and buried services.

Unit

Rate

C

C

001

Site

Wide Foundations/Concrete - supply and installation

Unit

Rate

C

D

001

Final

Grading, Site Finishes and Paving

Unit

Rate

C

M

001

Structural,

Mechanical, Piping, Electrical and Instrumentation (SMPEI). Includes the installation of “free issued” equipment.

Lump

Sum

C

E

001

High

voltage and medium voltage equipment installation including Main Substation, distribution, and E-Houses.

Lump

Sum

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-13

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

5.4 Permitting

The

objective of this section is to identify and discuss the major permits and regulatory approvals that may be required for the construction

and operation of the proposed facility based on the current understanding of the project. As the project advances and the design, footprint,

and execution strategy become better defined, additional permitting requirements may be identified, and the permitting strategy may be

refined accordingly.

Depending

on the final project scope, funding structure, federal involvement, and regulatory jurisdiction, a review under the National Environmental

Policy Act (NEPA) may be required. Should NEPA applicability be triggered, the appropriate federal agency could undertake an environmental

review to evaluate potential impacts associated with the proposed facility. The extent of such a review would depend on the nature of

the federal action involved and the potential environmental effects identified during project development. NEPA reviews can be comprehensive

and, where required, may represent a significant component of the overall permitting schedule. At this stage, the applicability and scope

of any potential NEPA review have not yet been determined.

Permitting

for the new facility at the State and Federal level, assuming that a NEPA is not required, is assumed to take one year to complete. If

a NEPA is required, however, permitting could take up to three years to complete.

5.5 Execution

Schedule

A

high-level project execution schedule, for the Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project, including Pre-Feasibility Study, Feasibility and

FEED project development stages, is presented in Appendix A. All durations are based on preliminary information and/or experience from

other projects.

Permitting

tasks have been included assuming that a NEPA will not be required and that permit documents can be developed based on interim Feasibility

level documents.

Development

of a novel process is a journey of discovery and is therefore unpredictable. The path forward should be re-evaluated following completion

of each development phase. In some cases, design concepts may need to be changed and a project engineering phase repeated accordingly.

This

schedule is presented to facilitate discussions regarding project execution strategies.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

Page 5-14

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

Appendix

A:

Execution Schedule

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026

Ramaco

Resources

Brook

Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial

Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities

2026-07-28

0

Issued

for Use

G.

Maskaluk

J.

Gorst

F.

Delgado

Date

Rev.

Status

Prepared

By

Checked

By

Approved

By

Approved

By

Client

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026

Table

of Contents

6.

Project Risks

and Opportunities

6-1

6.1

General Risks

6-1

6.2

Opportunities

6-2

6.2.1

Chlorine Recovery

from PVC

6-2

6.2.2

E-Waste Feed Integration

6-7

6.2.3

Execution Schedule Acceleration

6-8

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0

Page 6-i

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026

6. Project

Risks and Opportunities

A

risk register has not been developed for this phase of the project. A risk review and register preparation are recommended to be prepared

at the start of the pre-feasibility study, for the selected flowsheet. Higher risks and opportunities are summarized in the sections

below.

6.1 General

Risks

Major

risks that apply to the current flowsheet include:

● Preparation

of flowsheet for separation may be compromised due to lack of definition on project concept.

The project concept needs to be defined based on test work data in the next phase of the

project.

● Test

work for the current flowsheet including carbo-chlorination is not available, as such, the

process definition cannot be frozen. Additional updates/rework may be required if test work

results indicate changes to the process definition.

● Pyrometallurgical

equipment operability will likely be lower than the overall plant operation (92%) due to

the limited experience with the equipment. More frequent and longer downtimes may be required,

especially in early phases of plant operation.

● The

nitrogen and oxygen demand may increase based on incoming test work data, changes in process

definition, and equipment modification. Specifically, the carbo-chlorination units may require

oxygen addition to maintain the target operating temperatures. The Air Separation Plant footprint,

power demand, and equipment fee will be impacted if the demand for nitrogen and oxygen gases

increases.

● The

quartz removal efficiency from the beneficiation area has not been confirmed. Larger equipment

may be needed in all areas downstream of the beneficiation if the quartz removal is less

efficient than expected.

● A

more robust off-gas treatment system may be needed for the project. Off-gas species and amounts

from pyrometallurgical units need to be confirmed.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0

Page 6-1

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026

● Many

equipment pieces are preliminary customizations for the new flowsheet including the carbo-chlorination

units. Bespoke equipment will require additional testing and definition to ensure their operability

at a commercial scale.

6.2 Opportunities

A

list of opportunities identified by Ramaco for the selected flowsheet are outlined below.

6.2.1 Chlorine

Recovery from PVC

The

recovery of chlorine gas from scrap polyvinyl chloride (PVC) by thermal pyrolysis and HCl oxidation was identified by Ramaco as a potential

opportunity to reduce the amount of purchased Cl2, and thereby operating cost, for the carbo-chlorination circuit. Through

the “Technical Opportunity Statement PVC Waste Pyrolysis as a Chlorine Make-Up Source for Carbochlorination” dated

May 2026, Ramaco requested that Hatch obtain budget-level capital and operating cost estimates from HCl oxidation vendors. The following

subsections summarize Hatch’s correspondence with specialist vendors Sumitomo Chemical (Section 6.2.1.1) and Thyssenkrupp Nucera

(Section 6.2.1.2), as well as a preliminary list of additional considerations that may need to be addressed in subsequent engineering

phases (Section 6.2.1.3).

6.2.1.1 Sumitomo

Chemical HCl Oxidation Process

Sumitomo

Chemical is a technology licensing supplier of a Deacon HCl oxidation process to produce a chlorine gas product. Technip Energies owns

the exclusive licensing rights to Sumitomo Chemical’s HCl oxidation technology. Hatch has engaged in preliminary discussions with

Technip Energies, and a summary of the correspondence can be found below. Note that an NDA must be executed to receive capital and operating

cost estimates.

● Sumitomo

Chemical has 23 years of experience in HCl oxidation with their first commercial installation

in 2003. Currently they have 10 installed licensees, primarily in the MDI/TDI industries

● Sumitomo

Chemical owns the technology and supplies the catalyst, Technip Energies licenses the technology,

and JFE Engineering Corporation supplies the reactor

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0

Page 6-2

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026

● In

Sumitomo Chemical’s HCl oxidation process gaseous HCl and oxygen is fed to a fixed-bed

tubular reactor to produce chlorine gas. The exothermic energy released from HCl oxidation

is recovered to produce steam. The chlorine gas is then scrubbed with water to remove unreacted

HCl, producing a by-product of muriatic acid. The chlorine gas is then dried using sulphuric

acid and purified to remove inert gases. A schematic of the process can be found in Figure

6-1.

● Chlorine

gas purity: 99.7 vol.% (for MDI/TDI references)

● HCl

conversion: ~85%

♦ Increased

to ~90% conversion with the addition of an HCl stripper

♦ Increased

to ~98% conversion with full azeotropic distillation system

● Reactor

catalyst: RuO2/TiO2

● Catalyst

lifespan: >2 year (typically 2.5 years)

♦ HCl

feed purity can significantly influence the catalyst lifespan. Impurities such as bromides,

sulphur, and organics will reduce catalyst lifespan. Impurity definition is crucial for assessing

catalyst replacement frequency and overall suitability of Sumitomo Chemical HCl oxidation

process

● A

single train can be designed within the production range of 60-240 ktpa of chlorine gas

● Energy

consumption of Sumitomo Chemical’s process is approximately 8-10 times less than HCl

electrolysis with oxygen-depolarized cathode

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0

Page 6-3

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026

Figure

6-1: Sumitomo Chemical HCl Oxidation Process Schematic

6.2.1.2 Thyssenkrupp

Nucera HCl Oxidation Process

Thyssenkrupp

Nucera provides an oxygen-depolarized cathode hydrochloric acid (ODC-HCl) electrolysis technology to produce a chlorine gas product.

Hatch has engaged in preliminary discussions with Thyssenkrupp, and a summary of the correspondence can be found below.

In

addition, Thyssenkrupp has provided an order of magnitude plant area cost of 120,000,000 Euro, inclusive of engineering and bulking material

for piping, electrical, and instrumentation. Cost associated with structural steel, civil works, and erection activities are excluded.

Estimated utility and power consumption was also provided.

Note

that Thyssenkrupp is discussing internally if an NDA is required to provide capital and operating cost estimates.

● Thyssenkrupp

Nucera has over 600 electrochemical plant references and 40 references providing full engineering,

procurement, and construction services.

● In

the ODC-HCl process, hydrochloric gas and demineralized water are fed to an HCl absorber

to produce a 28-37 wt.% HCl solution. This solution is mixed with a depleted recirculating

HCl solution to create a 14 wt.% HCl solution for feeding to the anode side of the electrolysis

cell where anodic oxidation occurs, producing chlorine gas. Oxygen is fed on the cathode

side to react with hydrogen ions to produce an acid wastewater stream. A schematic of the

process can be found in Figure 6-2.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0

Page 6-4

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026

● Chlorine

gas purity: not provided.

● HCl

conversion: ~98%.

● Cathode

and anode replacement/refurbishment frequency was not provided.

● Membrane

lifespan: 4-8 years.

● The

target chlorine gas production of 10-11 tph is within the technologies capability and aligns

with other built plants.

● Operational

flexibility is a key advantage of the ODC-HCl process as it can operate at lowered Cl2

throughput capacities and increasing HCl production if desirable based on market conditions.

● Disadvantage

of the electrolysis process is high electrical power consumption.

● Thyssenkrupp

highlighted the importance of mitigating impurities, particularly organics. Impurity definition

is crucial for assessing membrane replacement frequency and overall suitability of the HCl-ODC

process.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0

Page 6-5

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026

Figure

6-2: ThyssenKrupp Nucera HCl-ODC Electrolysis Process Schematic

6.2.1.3 Future

Considerations

To

further develop the potential opportunity to recover chlorine gas from scrap PVC, Hatch has prepared a preliminary list of considerations

be addressed in subsequent engineering phases:

● Receive

preliminary cost estimates from HCl oxidation vendors (on-going).

● Identification

of scrap PVC supply source and composition.

● Ideation

session(s) should be completed to identify suitable reactor(s) for PVC thermal pyrolysis

at a commercial scale.

● Mass

and energy balance, order of magnitude capital and operational cost assessment of selected

pyrolysis technology.

● Pyrolysis

reactor test work to confirm reactor viability and define off-gas impurities.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0

Page 6-6

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026

● Provide

HCl oxidation vendor(s) updated HCl gas composition to determine HCl gas treatment requirements

to adhere with vendor inlet specifications. This will also inform off-gas equipment selection.

● Order

of magnitude capital and operating cost of the complete PVC to chlorine flowsheet to assess

economic viability.

6.2.2 E-Waste

Feed Integration

Ramaco

identified a potential opportunity to increase gallium and germanium production through the addition of an electronic waste (“e-waste”)

feed to be processed in the current carbo-chlorination process. Through the “Technical Opportunity Statement Gallium- and Germanium-Rich

E-Waste as a Critical Mineral Feed Sweetener for Carbochlorination” dated May 2026, Ramaco has requested that Hatch determines

the feasibility of processing a feed enriched with less than 3 wt.% e-waste through the current carbo-chlorination process.

Hatch

recognises this as an opportunity. It is expected that all critical minerals will chlorinate in the carbo-chlorination process. However,

the following should be investigated in the next phases of the project:

● Definition

of the e-waste feed composition, including organics, sulphur, copper, mercury, lead, arsenic,

halides, etc. The complete composition is will be used to evaluate if additional processing

steps are necessary to remove impurities to meet to emissions/waste requirements and product

specifications.

● Halides

are common in e-waste and may produce acid gases. Definition of halide levels is required

to determine if additional processing steps are required to remove acid gases and to determine

if materials of construction as currently selected are suitable.

● Test

work on the feed blend is recommended to determine the calorific value generated from organics

combustion to better understand the energy balance impact on the carbo-chlorination reactor.

It may be possible that organic combustion could offset some of the reactor fuel requirement.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0

Page 6-7

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026

● Currently,

the carbo-chlorination reactor is expected to operate with sub-stoichiometric oxygen addition

which may promote volatilization of organics. Other operations that process e-waste in starved

air conditions (in rotary kilns) would suggest that volatilization of organics is expected

to occur. Impact of organics in the sublimation process should be investigated to determine

if an after burner, or other equipment is required.

● Assess

if the addition of e-waste to the carbo-chlorination reactor could impact the ability to

maintain fluidization.

● Arsenic

is reported to be in the e-waste as GaAs. Arsenic chloride may be generated in the carbo-chlorination

reactor and is considered highly toxic. HAZOPs should be conducted to ensure the process

and plant is safely designed for the presence of arsenic chloride.

● Review

arsenic emission limits to inform if additional process steps are required to adhere to such

limits.

● Evaluation

of how to separate arsenic chloride from valuable metallic chlorides should be completed.

This may require test work.

● Mass

balance should be competed to determine if current carbo-chlorination reactors and downstream

equipment are appropriately sized for the increased Ga and Ge production.

● Identify

which, if any, regulations, permitting requirements, waste specifications would be applicable

when processing e-waste to inform equipment selection and additional process steps if required.

● Order

of magnitude capital and operating cost estimation to assess economic viability.

6.2.3 Execution

Schedule Acceleration

An

opportunity to accelerate the overall project execution schedule was identified and preliminarily assessed by the project team and is

presented herein for discussion purposes. The opportunity has not been subject to detailed engineering, execution planning, risk assessment,

or commercial evaluation and should therefore be considered a conceptual schedule acceleration scenario rather than a fully developed

execution strategy.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0

Page 6-8

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026

This

accelerated execution strategy assumes that several key engineering, procurement, and project development activities are initiated prior

to Full Approval to Proceed (FID) and before all project uncertainties have been fully resolved. These early commitments are required

to maintain the accelerated project schedule and to prevent long-lead activities from becoming critical path constraints.

Key

early commitments include:

● Progression

of Basic Engineering/FEED to a level sufficient to support permit applications, early works

design, and procurement activities.

● Advancement

of Detailed Engineering packages for site preparation, civil works, utilities, and critical

process systems prior to project sanction.

● Early

release of engineering work packages to support tendering, vendor engagement, and equipment

specification development.

● Procurement

of long-lead and critical equipment based on preliminary design information to secure manufacturing

capacity and delivery dates.

● Placement

of early purchase orders, letters of intent, or reservation agreements for equipment with

extended fabrication durations.

● Advancement

of geotechnical investigations, site characterization programs, and construction planning

activities to support early works execution.

● Mobilization

of owner and EPCM resources earlier than would typically occur under a conventional stage-gated

project development process.

These

activities would require expenditure of capital prior to FID and may commit the project to specific design solutions before completion

of detailed engineering and final commercial evaluations. Consequently, changes arising from ongoing engineering development, permitting

requirements, technology optimization, constructability reviews, market conditions, or project sanction decisions could result in engineering

rework, procurement changes, contract amendments, schedule disruption, or additional cost.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0

Page 6-9

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026

As

a result, while early engineering and procurement commitments are essential to achieving the accelerated schedule, they increase project

execution, commercial, and financial risk relative to a conventional development approach where major engineering and procurement commitments

are deferred until after Full Approval to Proceed has been received.

Under

this scenario, project Handover to Operations for Start-up could potentially be achieved approximately seven months earlier than the

conventional execution approach, as presented in Figure 6-3.

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0

Page 6-10

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026

Figure

6-3: Opportunity to Accelerate Execution Schedule

H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0

Page 6-11

© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.

EX-99.2 — SHAREHOLDER LETTER ISSUED BY RAMACO RESOURCES, INC. DATED JULY 29, 2026

EX-99.2

Filename: ea029953301ex99-2.htm · Sequence: 3

Exhibit 99.2

July 29, 2026

Dear Shareholders,

Over the past several quarterly releases and earnings remarks we have

discussed our ongoing work to develop our rare earth and other critical mineral operations at the exploratory Brook Mine in Wyoming. Since

my last Letter to Shareholders in September 2025, we have continued a fundamental internal realignment to create a dual-platform structure,

with our metallurgical coal and potential critical mineral businesses as distinct operating entities. In this letter, I will focus on

our emerging rare earth and other critical mineral operations.

Our last independent conceptual study of the Brook Mine project was

conducted by Fluor Corp. and released in July 2025 (the “Fluor Report”). Today, we are releasing a new independent conceptual

study from Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc. (“Hatch”). Hatch was engaged to provide a preliminary refining process definition

to be used in a future technical report summary and initial assessment of the economic potential of the Brook Mine Critical Mineral Project

1(“Project”).

The Fluor report analyzed the separation and extraction processing

of the various critical minerals and rare earths into oxides at our proposed mine-mouth critical mineral refinery (“CMR”)

using a conventional technique called solvent extraction. The Fluor report also identified alternative processing techniques that we investigated

further after the initial report was published.

The Hatch report analyzed the flowsheet design for the CMR to process,

separate and extract critical minerals and rare earths into mineral oxides, metals and mixed rare earth carbonate (“MREC”).

Hatch’s focus of analysis was a carbochlorination processing technique which I describe below.

The CMR will be a central component of our proposed vertically integrated

critical mineral supply chain Project co-located at our Brook Mine site in Sheridan, Wyoming. This complex will encompass the upstream

feedstock mining operations at our Brook Mine, midstream processing of oxides and MREC at the CMR and downstream commercial sales and

product marketing coordinated through our Strategic Critical Mineral Stockpile and Terminal (“SCMT”).

Since last July, we have brought onto our Ramaco team the two former

senior Fluor team members who prepared that report to help guide our metallurgical test work and advance our processing design efforts

at the CMR. This led to a fundamental reassessment of the optimal processing method to separate and refine our unique carbonaceous critical

mineral feedstock contained in relatively soft, coal and contiguous clays and shales. The refining technique we arrived at is called carbochlorination,

which we have previously disclosed. We have also filed for patent protection on its application to our updated flowsheet.

1 Note

the Hatch report is at an initial assessment level of study and, accordingly, all estimates and projections contained therein are based

on limited and preliminary data. The estimates were completed to AACE Class 5 with an accuracy of -35/+50% with a contingency of 30%

on the process plant. The assessment was based on 100% inferred mineral resources which are speculative, and there is no certainty that

the results of the Initial Assessment will be realized. However, if no Inferred mineral resources were included in the cash flow of the

Initial Assessment, then there would be no project. Therefore, while the work, results, estimates and projections are not definitive,

they may nonetheless be considered generally indicative of the nature and quality of the Project.

This is a proven processing method which has been used in the titanium

industry for over 75 years. Through ongoing geological, mineralogical and metallurgical analysis and testing, this new flowsheet was adapted

and refined to process the unconventional feedstock coming from the Brook Mine. The objective was to improve the potential critical mineral

and rare earth feedstock separations and extractions to produce oxides and MREC.

Today’s study from Hatch analyzed the overall Project and specifically

the CMR using this revised carbochlorination process and then provided independent preliminary estimates of capital and operating costs.

Hatch in turn relied on another independent analysis of the carbochlorination process itself, which was conducted by Kingston Process

Metallurgy, Inc. (“KPM”).

The change in the refining process method has a dramatic impact not

only on our estimates of the Brook Mine project economics, but also on the allocation of the potential critical mineral and rare earth

product slate we expect to be capable of producing.

This initial assessment using the current Hatch report will be superseded

by a full Preliminary Feasibility Study (“PFS”), which will further define the Project. As part of the PFS study Hatch will

test and confirm additional opportunities such as recycling electronic waste (“e-waste”) into our feedstock stream with the

objective of enhancing realizations, as explained below.

The key highlights for our investors that are presented below are

from both the Hatch report (we have incorporated their independent capital and operating cost estimates) and separately from our own

internal projected economics for the Brook Mine Project. Investors should note that the figures below on NPV8, IRR, adjusted EBITDA and

revenue were internally prepared estimates by Ramaco. They have not been independently verified, and are superimposed on Hatch’s

independent operating cost and capital expenditure estimates2:

● The

Brook Mine NPV has increased 567% to $8.0 billion before tax, and increased 537% to $6.4 billion after tax since the release of our 2025

third-party Fluor Report. This increase primarily reflects a change to a carbochlorination processing methodology referred to in the

Hatch report from Fluor’s solvent-extraction methodology in their 2025 study. Because of this change, the two studies do not have

functional equivalency. This NPV is shown visually below with cash flows through 2034 but reflects a 40-year mine life. It does not

reflect the potential multi-generational mine life referenced elsewhere in this letter.

● Average projected annual adjusted EBITDA of $1.3 billion is up almost ~800%

from that same report3. Analogous to the NPV comparison, this increase reflects the change in processing methodology to the

carbochlorination technique rather than organic project improvement, and the figures are not directly comparable to the Fluor report on

an equivalent basis.

2 The

economic estimates in this letter, including the NPV, IRR, adjusted EBITDA and revenue figures, are preliminary in nature and are based

on inferred mineral resources. Inferred mineral resources are categorized as too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations

applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and therefore there is no certainty that these preliminary

economic estimates will be realized. These estimates are internally prepared by Ramaco and are not the output of an “initial assessment,”

pre-feasibility study or feasibility study prepared by a qualified person under Regulation S-K, Subpart 1300. A pre-feasibility study

will be necessary to support the production schedule laid out in the economics, including the timing of construction and commercial operation.

2

● The above estimated NPV and adjusted EBITDA figures do not factor in any

additional potential economic upside or processing efficiency from the use of blending recycled e-waste and PVC waste into our feedstock

before processing. Hatch has independently confirmed this as an opportunity, subject to further testing and investigation planned for

this year and expected to be addressed in the PFS. We have also filed for patent protection on both of these recycling methods.

● The capital for construction of the project is preliminarily estimated by

Hatch at $3.2 billion, with an additional contingency of ~$0.8 billion1. We anticipate that these figures may be higher than

the ultimate final construction numbers given the current early stage of process design which is prior to pilot testing to optimize design

and equipment requirements which may reduce the contingency.

● Scandium remains an important component of our product slate at 18% of projected

revenue. However, this is significantly reduced from prior solvent-extraction figures, under which scandium previously accounted for more

than half of our project revenue. Although scandium’s share of projected revenue has declined under the carbochlorination flowsheet,

we continue to regard scandium as a strategically important product. We do not expect this change in product mix to affect existing customer

or governmental interest.

● The

switch from solvent extraction to the new carbochlorination flowsheet is expected to allow approximately 75% of anticipated Brook Mine

revenue to be tied to commodities whose primary demand driver is the semiconductor industry such as gallium metal, germanium oxide, high-purity

silica (“HPS”) and high-purity alumina (“HPA”). Given the expected growth in all forms of computerized related

commerce such as data centers and AI, we view this as a strong underpinning of the future market for oxide and related products from

the Brook Mine.

Key Economics of Brook Mine Project

Below are the key projected economic details of the Brook Mine Project3.

The key inputs for the financial model include:

● A life-of-mine production schedule derived from the optimized pit shell.

● Capital and operating cost estimates used by Hatch in its conceptual study,

using Hatch’s upsized production case.

● Third-party inputs, such as extraction rates from metallurgical testing,

to estimate overall recoveries and inform annual production levels.

Ramaco then applied discounts to internally researched Western spot

prices to arrive at internally prepared annual cash flow figures. As such, the NPV, IRR, adjusted EBITDA, payback period and revenue

figures4 in this report are Ramaco’s internal estimates.

3 The preliminary economic estimates described in this letter have not been prepared as part of an initial assessment, pre-feasibility study

or feasibility study under Item 1302 of Regulation S-K, and no Technical Report Summary has been filed with respect to these estimates.

The Company expects to file an S-K 1300 compliant Technical Report Summary by the end of the calendar year 2026.

4 Adjusted

EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. Because the amounts presented are forward-looking projections, the Company is unable to reconcile

projected adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure without unreasonable effort, primarily due to the difficulty

of predicting the timing and amount of items that would be required for a GAAP measure, including future capital expenditures, taxes,

financing costs and other non-cash or non-recurring items, which may be significant.

3

Our internally prepared financial model below shows the Brook Mine’s

potential to generate significant economic value, delivering compelling ongoing cash flows as well as after-tax NPV and IRR. The strength

of these financial metrics demonstrates the underlying asset quality and supports continued investment in advancing the Project toward

production.

The above projected economics are based on figures in the Hatch report

using 2.6 million tonnes of critical mineral feedstock processed into the CMR. In addition to the 2.6 million tonnes of critical mineral

feedstock, the carbochlorination process allows for an additional ~0.9 million tonnes of mineralized coal to be processed through the

plant, which results in additional saleable MREC product.

The Hatch report also provided alternative figures calculated on a

lower 1.3-million-tonne critical mineral feedstock case— which established a scalable, lower-capital baseline that could be incrementally

upsized based on demand—and the higher feedstock input.

Our economics are shown visually through 2034, although our discounted

NPV accounts for a 40-year mine life. As further drilling and analysis occurs, we anticipate the Brook Mine has the potential to meaningfully

exceed its currently estimated mine life only utilizing the 4,500 acres currently permitted for mining. As previously disclosed, there

are an additional ~11,500 acres contiguous to the permitted area on which we are performing drilling and geological analysis.

4

The next chart below compares a summary of the general economic results

from both the current Hatch report and last year’s Fluor report, with production units shown in tonnes.

The next chart below details the potential key product suite and each

product’s contribution to internally calculated revenue. As noted, the carbochlorination flowsheet allows for approximately 75%

of our anticipated Brook Mine Project internally prepared revenue to be tied to key commodities such as gallium metal, germanium oxide,

HPA and HPS whose primary demand driver is the semiconductor industry.

The price deck we used for this analysis, when compared with current

Western spot prices, is shown in the next chart below. For commodities with a quoted Western spot price (such as gallium and key rare

earths), we show that price. For commodities with a recent market transaction marker (such as the U.S. Department of War purchase of scandium),

we use that as a market reference. Where neither exists, we use third party consensus or similar long-term pricing, without price escalation

over the life of mine.

5

The key takeaway: we are modeling our projections using material discounts

across all oxide, metal, MREC, other critical mineral products and HPS. We believe that, given the geopolitical and supply-chain realities,

any comparison to Chinese government-published spot indexes is fundamentally misguided.

Because the projected economics are strongly dependent on realized

commodity prices and the discounts we apply, changes in those assumptions would have a corresponding effect on projected NPV, IRR, adjusted

EBITDA and revenue. We have not presented a sensitivity analysis illustrating how these metrics would vary under alternative pricing scenarios,

and investors should not assume that the modeled prices or discounts will be realized.

Key Details

Beyond the highlights noted above, below is additional detail on key

aspects of the Brook Mine Project based on Hatch analysis of the carbochlorination flowsheet and our internally prepared projections:

● Financials:

Pre-tax NPV8 of $8.0 billion — a 567% increase from

the previous flowsheet. Pre-tax IRR of 24%. Adjusted annual EBITDA averages $1.3 billion over the mine life, with $1.7 billion

in average annual revenue.

● Production:

The total feed to the plant includes inferred resources

of carbonaceous clays and mineralized coal. Over the life of mine, the average grades of critical mineral oxide (“CMO”)5

are 416 ppm, as well as 7.6% Al and 21.0% Si.

Over a 40-year mine life, average annual feed to the carbochlorination

facility is ~3.5 million tonnes of enriched carbonaceous clays and shales as well as mineralized coal (~2.6 million tonnes of clays/shales

and ~0.9 million tonnes of coal). Average annual production is included in the Brook Mine Summary table above, which includes revenue

from approximately 1.5 million tonnes per year of thermal coal. As previously disclosed, we intend to use the coal as the “carbo”

reagent in the carbochlorination process and/or to sell the remaining coal into the power markets.

5 CMO

includes oxides of Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu plus Ga and Ge.

6

● Flowsheet:

Small amounts of the kaolinite in the enriched clay zones are converted

into HPA and HPS by reaction with chlorine. Approximately 5% of the Al2O3 associated with kaolinite is converted

to HPA and 2.5% of the SiO2. Volatile chloride compounds, which include gallium, germanium, alumina and silica are then recovered,

separated and purified from the gaseous stream. The mineralized coal serves as a carbon source and necessary reagent, contributing incremental

rare earth and other critical mineral production. Rare earths are converted to chlorides but predominantly remain in the residue where

they are leached with water. Impurities are removed before precipitation of an MREC that will be sold to be refined by a third party.

Gallium’s thermodynamic behavior under carbochlorination

conditions is well established — it reports efficiently as a vapor in the off-gas where it is recovered and purified. We intend

to produce gallium metal to access higher-value end markets across semiconductors, AI server power electronics, precision optics, and

5G/6G networks.

Carbochlorination extracts meaningfully both more product

and revenue from the Brook Mine deposit than we achieved in the conventional hydrometallurgical process. It has additional benefits, including

lower water consumption and flowsheet simplification through production of MREC rather than solvent-extraction separation. The expanded

product suite provides meaningful exposure to supply chain security across semiconductors, aerospace, defense, and magnets.

● Extraction Recoveries:

Independent testing at KPM’s third-party lab achieved

high carbochlorination extractions for all key revenue generating critical minerals and silica. The Brook Mine feedstock was effectively

consumed in the carbochlorination tests with initial results from KPM showing original average extraction levels over 90%. Further testing

now indicates upside from recoveries exceeding 98%. Recovery projections were estimated downstream to determine overall plant recoveries.

Further test work is planned in Q3 at Ramaco’s own

laboratory facility to expand the test program at bench-scale to validate metallurgical performance throughout the flowsheet and optimize

operating conditions. Further recovery results will be included in the PFS.

● E-waste Opportunity:

We are evaluating the technical viability and economics

of incorporating electronic waste (e-waste) blended into the feedstock, with sourcing efforts targeting e-waste containing higher concentrations

of gallium and germanium. Because carbochlorination effectively extracts REEs and other critical minerals, even small amounts of e-waste

could significantly increase revenue from material otherwise destined for landfill — particularly gallium and germanium-rich waste,

which is difficult to recycle by other methods. We will also explore other possible forms of e-waste targeting additional products6.

6 Incorporating

e-waste and PVC waste as feedstock may subject these activities to hazardous-waste handling and permitting requirements under the Resource

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and comparable state laws, and any internationally sourced e-waste may be subject to U.S. import

restrictions. We will evaluate these regulatory considerations as part of our ongoing testing and the PFS.

7

● Product Offtake:

We remain in advanced stages of product offtake discussions

with potential domestic groups, both private and governmental, as well as international groups.

In parallel with the technical work

supporting the Hatch report, we have advanced a comprehensive commercial strategy focused on integrating future Brook Mine oxide, metal,

and MREC products into domestic and allied critical mineral supply chains. In support of these efforts, Ramaco has hired and onboarded

internal marketing and sales staff dedicated solely to the Brook Mine materials, as well as contracted several consultants who specialize

in specific minerals and supply chains.

With this expanded commercial capability,

Ramaco has now established relationships across the downstream value chains for each of the principal Brook Mine products. Ramaco is pursuing

a framework of prospective offtake agreements, whether formally via MOUs or informally. These should mature into negotiation of definitive

commercial agreements as Brook Mine products progress through laboratory qualification and pilot-scale production.

Also, recognizing that the Brook Mine

critical mineral deposit was discovered in partnership with the U.S. government, Ramaco continues to build relationships within government

to support the strategic initiatives to onshore Western critical mineral supply chains. We are in active discussion with the Department

of War, the Department of Commerce and also maintain our on-going involvement with the Department of Energy.

● Financing:

We are currently in discussions regarding a variety of third-party

project financing regarding funding for the CMR involving the public and private sectors, including U.S. governmental groups mentioned

above. Details will be disclosed when transactions are advanced to the point of specific documentation.

I would note that our major capital requirements for the

CMR are more than two years away. Our future testing, pilot plant and mining capital requirements can all be met from current internal

funds. We also expect that there will be substantial future risk mitigation to the project in the form of offtake agreements, greater

clarity of the level of capital requirements from further design and process optimization and, of course, technological refinements to

the overall critical mineral refining and separation process.

We are well capitalized, patient and methodical. We will

strive to finance the project to obtain the strongest possible value for our shareholders.

8

● Capital Cost:

In Hatch’s upsized case, total initial pre-production capital

cost estimates are $3.2 billion before a $0.8 billion contingency, or $4.0 billion in total post-contingency. The capital cost estimate

completed by Hatch for the process facility corresponds to an AACE Class 5 estimate, with an accuracy range of -35%/+50% and a 30% contingency

applied within Hatch’s scope for the process plant.

The higher capital cost at this stage of the carbochlorination

process versus the earlier hydrometallurgical process reflects:

o feed preparation requirements for mineralized coal,

o a more conservative view of reaction kinetics (versus the titanium industry) impacting the size and thickness of reactors (and thus

cost) pending further testing in the pilot phase,

o higher product production tonnages, and

o conservative selection of materials for construction pending further engineering evaluation.

The next project phase will include the exploration of opportunities

to meaningfully reduce anticipated capital cost impacts.

We have provided owner’s estimates for certain costs

including mine fleet, mine development, residue storage, rail loadout, permitting and regulatory matters, infrastructure outside the process

plant battery limit, and the owner’s operating team.

● Execution Schedule:

We requested that Hatch provide an accelerated project execution

plan for construction and development of the CMR. The table below provides high-level milestones per Hatch’s accelerated timeline. This

strategy assumes that key engineering, procurement, and development activities are initiated prior to Final Investment Decision (“FID”)

and before all project uncertainties are fully resolved. These early commitments are required to maintain the accelerated schedule and

to prevent long-lead activities from becoming critical-path constraints.

● Geological Advancement:

We have continued an aggressive on-going program of geological

study and assessment of the 4,500 acres permitted area of the deposit. To date we have drilled 684 core holes (equaling roughly 11 miles

of coring). We have conducted ~7,500 ICP-MS tests on samples, plus ~34,000 XRF tests. We will continue this comprehensive level of testing

in order to add detail to the characterization of the mineral resource and to advance its classification from inferred to indicated. We

will also move to further geological testing on the balance of the roughly 11,500 additional acres which have not yet been permitted.

9

● Pilot Plant Advancement:

Construction of the pilot plant has continued to progress

this summer, with completion of the building shell anticipated this October. Based on receipt of further design criteria from Hatch, we

expect Zeton, Inc. to begin engineering in Q3 2026. The fabricated equipment modules from Zeton are then projected to ship for installation

in the first half of 2027 with the pilot plant becoming fully operational later in 2027.

Once that building shell is complete this fall, chemical,

metallurgical and geological testing operations will begin at this new location, in addition to those being conducted at our existing

iCAM research center in Sheridan.

Addressing U.S. and Global Market Demand

As previously noted, the Brook Critical Mineral Project

complex — including the Brook Mine itself, combined with the midstream CMR refinery and downstream SCMT marketing terminal —

has the potential to supply a substantial volume of the processed oxide, metal and MREC needed to meet meaningful levels of both U.S.

domestic and international demand.

The chart below shows the potential annual Brook Project

product slate production compared with current levels of U.S. and global demand.

In closing, we look forward to providing more commentary on our Q2

earnings call, which is scheduled for August 5th. We will also continue to provide periodic updates on significant milestones as development

of the Brook Mine critical mineral and rare earth project unfolds over the coming months.

All the best,

/s/ Randall

W. Atkins

Randall W. Atkins

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

10

ABOUT RAMACO RESOURCES

Ramaco Resources, Inc. is an operator and developer of high-quality,

low-cost metallurgical coal in southern West Virginia and southwestern Virginia, and is exploring a coal, rare earth and other critical

minerals project in Wyoming. The Company’s executive offices are located in Lexington, Kentucky, with operational offices in Charleston,

West Virginia and Sheridan, Wyoming. The Company currently has four active metallurgical coal mining complexes in Central Appalachia and

one coal mine and rare earth element and other critical mineral exploration stage property near Sheridan, Wyoming (the “Brook Mine”).

The Brook Mine remains an exploration stage property, and no assurance can be given that it will be successfully developed into a commercial

scale mine or that any inferred mineral resources estimated will be converted into higher confidence mineral resources or eventually mineral

reserves. Contiguous to the Brook Mine, the Company operates a carbon research facility related to the potential production of advanced

carbon products and materials from coal. In connection with these activities, it holds a body of more than 70 intellectual property patents,

pending applications, exclusive licensing agreements and various trademarks. News and additional information about Ramaco Resources, including

filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are available at https://www.ramacoresources.com.

For more information, contact investor relations at (859) 244-7455.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Shareholder Letter constitute

“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, but not

limited to, statements related to future production volumes and sales, anticipated capital expenditures, expected demand for metallurgical

coal, the development and commercialization of the Brook Mine rare earth and critical mineral project, projected operating costs and margins,

and the Company’s financial guidance and outlook. These forward-looking statements represent Ramaco Resources’ expectations or beliefs

concerning guidance, future events, anticipated revenue, future demand and production levels, macroeconomic trends, the development of

ongoing projects, costs and expectations regarding operating results, and it is possible that the results described in this news release

will not be achieved.

These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties

and other factors, many of which are outside of Ramaco Resources’ control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from

the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.

These factors include, without limitation, unexpected delays in our

current mine development activities, the ability to successfully increase production at our existing met coal complexes in accordance

with the Company’s growth initiatives, failure of our sales commitment counterparties to perform, increased government regulation of coal

in the United States or internationally, the impact of tariffs imposed by the United States and foreign governments, the further decline

of demand for coal in export markets and underperformance of the railroads, the Company’s ability to successfully develop the exploratory

Brook Mine rare earth and critical mineral project, including whether the Company’s exploration target and estimates for such mine are

realized, the timing of the initial production of rare earth concentrates, the development of a pilot and ultimately a full-scale commercial

processing facility. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not meet the threshold for reserve modifying factors, such as estimated

economic viability, that would allow for conversion to mineral reserves. There is no certainty that any part of the inferred mineral resources

estimated at Brook Mine will be converted into higher confidence mineral resources and eventually mineral reserves in the future. Rare

earth and critical minerals are a new initiative for us and, as such, have required and will continue to require us to make significant

investments to build out our rare earth and other critical mineral capabilities.

11

Additional factors specific to the Brook Mine economic estimates include,

without limitation: the preliminary nature of the estimates and their reliance on inferred mineral resources, which are too speculative

to be classified as mineral reserves; the fact that the NPV, IRR, adjusted EBITDA and revenue figures are Ramaco’s internally prepared

estimates that have not been independently verified; the wide accuracy range of the capital cost estimate, which is an AACE Class 5 estimate

with an accuracy range of -35%/+50% (meaning the $4.0 billion post-contingency estimate could reasonably range from approximately $2.6

billion to $6.0 billion); the sensitivity of the projected economics to realized commodity prices and applied discounts, for which no

sensitivity analysis has been presented; the risk that anticipated non-dilutive project financing may not be available on acceptable terms

or at all, which could require the Company to raise additional capital, including equity that could dilute existing shareholders; and

regulatory risks associated with the planned incorporation of electronic waste and PVC waste as feedstock, including hazardous-waste handling

requirements under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and comparable state laws, as well as potential import restrictions

on internationally sourced e-waste.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it

is made, and, except as required by law, Ramaco Resources does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement,

whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for Ramaco

Resources to predict all such factors. When considering these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and

other cautionary statements found in Ramaco Resources’ filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including

its Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. The risk factors and other factors noted in Ramaco Resources’ SEC filings

could cause its actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

12

EX-99.3 — PRESS RELEASE ISSUED BY RAMACO RESOURCES, INC. DATED JULY 29, 2026

EX-99.3

Filename: ea029953301ex99-3.htm · Sequence: 4

Exhibit 99.3

Ramaco Resources Releases Hatch Report and Shareholder

Letter on

Exploratory Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project

LEXINGTON, Ky., July 29, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Ramaco Resources, Inc.

(NASDAQ: METC, METCB) (“Ramaco” or the “Company”) today released a new initial assessment report from Hatch Associates

Consultants, Inc. (“Hatch”) and an accompanying shareholder letter from Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Randall W. Atkins.

That letter highlights the current status of the Company’s rare earth and critical minerals project in Sheridan, Wyoming.

The Hatch study evaluates a previously announced carbochlorination-based

refining and flowsheet process for the Brook Mine project. It provides a preliminary process definition as well as capital and operating

cost estimates to assess the potential of the Brook Mine critical mineral project. Key findings are highlighted in the shareholder letter.

“The Hatch report and its analysis marks an important milestone

in advancing our vision of building a fully integrated domestic critical minerals platform,” said Mr. Atkins. “We believe the

Brook Mine complex has the potential to become a significant long-term supplier of critical minerals and rare earth products essential

to America’s industrial and technology supply chains.”

The Hatch report and shareholder letter are available on Ramaco’s website

here: https://www.ramacoresources.com. Additional renderings and project-related images are available on the website here: https://www.ramacoresources.com/critical-minerals.

Earlier in July, Ramaco hosted its 5th Annual Ramaco Research Rodeo

(R3) in Sheridan, Wyoming, where there was extensive discussion by industry leaders, researchers, policymakers, and investors related

to critical minerals, advanced carbon products, artificial intelligence, and energy innovation. A video presented during the conference

related to the Brook Mine project can be viewed here: https://ramacoresources.com/carbon-operations/

ABOUT RAMACO RESOURCES

Ramaco Resources, Inc. is an operator and developer of high-quality,

low-cost metallurgical coal in southern West Virginia, and southwestern Virginia and exploring a coal, rare earth and other critical

minerals project in Wyoming. The Company’s executive offices are located in Lexington, Kentucky, with operational offices in Charleston,

West Virginia and Sheridan, Wyoming. The Company currently has four active metallurgical coal mining complexes in Central Appalachia

and one coal mine and rare earth element and other critical mineral exploration stage property near Sheridan, Wyoming (the “Brook

Mine”). The Brook Mine remains an exploration stage property, and no assurance can be given that it will be successfully developed

into a commercial scale mine or that any inferred mineral resources estimated will be converted into higher confidence mineral resources

or eventually mineral reserves. Contiguous to the Brook Mine, the Company operates a carbon research facility related to the potential

production of advanced carbon products and materials from coal. In connection with these activities, it holds a body of more than 70

intellectual property patents, pending applications, exclusive licensing agreements and various trademarks.

News and additional information about Ramaco Resources, including filings

with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are available at https://www.ramacoresources.com. For more information, contact investor

relations at (859) 244-7455.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Hatch report is a scoping study and, accordingly, all estimates

and projections contained therein are based on limited and incomplete data. Therefore, while the work, results, estimates and projections

may be considered to be generally indicative of the nature and quality of the Project, they are not definitive.

Certain statements contained in this news release constitute “forward-looking

statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements represent

Ramaco Resources’ expectations or beliefs concerning guidance, future events, anticipated revenue, future demand and production levels,

macroeconomic trends, the development of ongoing projects, costs and expectations regarding operating results, and it is possible that

the results described in this news release will not be achieved.

These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties

and other factors, many of which are outside of Ramaco Resources’ control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from

the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.

These factors include, without limitation, unexpected delays in our

current mine development activities, the ability to successfully increase production at our existing met coal complexes in accordance

with the Company’s growth initiatives, failure of our sales commitment counterparties to perform, increased government regulation of coal

in the United States or internationally, the impact of tariffs imposed by the United States and foreign governments, the further decline

of demand for coal in export markets and underperformance of the railroads, the Company’s ability to successfully develop the Brook Mine

REE/CM project, including whether the Company’s exploration target and estimates for such mine are realized, the timing of the initial

production of rare earth concentrates, the development of a pilot and ultimately a full scale commercial processing facility. Mineral

resources are not mineral reserves and do not meet the threshold for reserve modifying factors, such as estimated economic viability,

that would allow for conversion to mineral reserves. There is no certainty that any part of the estimated mineral resources at Brook Mine

will be converted into mineral reserves in the future. Rare earth and critical minerals is a new initiative for us and, as such, has required

and will continue to require us to make significant investments to build out our rare earth capabilities.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it

is made, and, except as required by law, Ramaco Resources does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement,

whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for Ramaco

Resources to predict all such factors. When considering these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and

other cautionary statements found in Ramaco Resources’ filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including

its Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. The risk factors and other factors noted in Ramaco Resources’ SEC filings

could cause its actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

POINT OF CONTACT

George Cpin

VP, Finance & Investor Relations

info@ramacometc.com or 859-244-7455

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img1.jpg · Sequence: 5

Binary file (6069 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img1.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img2.jpg · Sequence: 6

Binary file (5420 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img2.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img3.jpg · Sequence: 7

Binary file (1949 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img3.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img4.jpg · Sequence: 8

Binary file (233823 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img4.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img5.jpg · Sequence: 9

Binary file (82365 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img5.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img6.jpg · Sequence: 10

Binary file (50424 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img6.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img7.jpg · Sequence: 11

Binary file (37844 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img7.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img8.jpg · Sequence: 12

Binary file (40087 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img8.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img9.jpg · Sequence: 13

Binary file (21721 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img9.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img10.jpg · Sequence: 14

Binary file (46822 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img10.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img11.jpg · Sequence: 15

Binary file (330731 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img11.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img12.jpg · Sequence: 16

Binary file (68746 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img12.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img13.jpg · Sequence: 17

Binary file (41636 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img13.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img14.jpg · Sequence: 18

Binary file (38936 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img14.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img15.jpg · Sequence: 19

Binary file (32044 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img15.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img16.jpg · Sequence: 20

Binary file (24646 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img16.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img17.jpg · Sequence: 21

Binary file (52332 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img17.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img18.jpg · Sequence: 22

Binary file (52129 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img18.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img19.jpg · Sequence: 23

Binary file (31530 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img19.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img20.jpg · Sequence: 24

Binary file (55201 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img20.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img21.jpg · Sequence: 25

Binary file (40045 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img21.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img22.jpg · Sequence: 26

Binary file (39428 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img22.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img23.jpg · Sequence: 27

Binary file (65581 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img23.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img24.jpg · Sequence: 28

Binary file (42697 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img24.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img25.jpg · Sequence: 29

Binary file (690897 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img25.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img26.jpg · Sequence: 30

Binary file (32102 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img26.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img27.jpg · Sequence: 31

Binary file (108936 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img27.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img28.jpg · Sequence: 32

Binary file (286804 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img28.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img29.jpg · Sequence: 33

Binary file (4733 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img29.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img30.jpg · Sequence: 34

Binary file (4175 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img30.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img31.jpg · Sequence: 35

Binary file (4455 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img31.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img32.jpg · Sequence: 36

Binary file (2548 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img32.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img33.jpg · Sequence: 37

Binary file (2472 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img33.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img34.jpg · Sequence: 38

Binary file (6057 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img34.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img35.jpg · Sequence: 39

Binary file (4659 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img35.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img36.jpg · Sequence: 40

Binary file (4500 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img36.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img37.jpg · Sequence: 41

Binary file (4605 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img37.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img38.jpg · Sequence: 42

Binary file (4471 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img38.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img39.jpg · Sequence: 43

Binary file (5215 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img39.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img40.jpg · Sequence: 44

Binary file (5646 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img40.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img41.jpg · Sequence: 45

Binary file (4460 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img41.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img42.jpg · Sequence: 46

Binary file (4250 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img42.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img43.jpg · Sequence: 47

Binary file (5031 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img43.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img44.jpg · Sequence: 48

Binary file (4197 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img44.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img45.jpg · Sequence: 49

Binary file (4053 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img45.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img46.jpg · Sequence: 50

Binary file (3668 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img46.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img47.jpg · Sequence: 51

Binary file (3736 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img47.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img48.jpg · Sequence: 52

Binary file (4104 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img48.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img49.jpg · Sequence: 53

Binary file (3801 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img49.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img50.jpg · Sequence: 54

Binary file (3724 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img50.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img51.jpg · Sequence: 55

Binary file (3527 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img51.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img52.jpg · Sequence: 56

Binary file (3125 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img52.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img53.jpg · Sequence: 57

Binary file (4159 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img53.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img54.jpg · Sequence: 58

Binary file (4401 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img54.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img55.jpg · Sequence: 59

Binary file (4138 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img55.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img56.jpg · Sequence: 60

Binary file (3933 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img56.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img57.jpg · Sequence: 61

Binary file (4034 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img57.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img58.jpg · Sequence: 62

Binary file (3929 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img58.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img59.jpg · Sequence: 63

Binary file (3871 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img59.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img60.jpg · Sequence: 64

Binary file (4642 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img60.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img61.jpg · Sequence: 65

Binary file (4041 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img61.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img62.jpg · Sequence: 66

Binary file (3653 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img62.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img63.jpg · Sequence: 67

Binary file (3248 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img63.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img64.jpg · Sequence: 68

Binary file (4993 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img64.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img65.jpg · Sequence: 69

Binary file (4805 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img65.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img66.jpg · Sequence: 70

Binary file (6534 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img66.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img67.jpg · Sequence: 71

Binary file (4187 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img67.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img68.jpg · Sequence: 72

Binary file (3558 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img68.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img69.jpg · Sequence: 73

Binary file (3913 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img69.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img70.jpg · Sequence: 74

Binary file (3633 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img70.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img71.jpg · Sequence: 75

Binary file (3597 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img71.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img72.jpg · Sequence: 76

Binary file (3924 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-1img72.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-2img1.jpg · Sequence: 77

Binary file (4445 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-2img1.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-2img2.jpg · Sequence: 78

Binary file (348264 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-2img2.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-2img3.jpg · Sequence: 79

Binary file (225140 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-2img3.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-2img4.jpg · Sequence: 80

Binary file (127262 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-2img4.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-2img5.jpg · Sequence: 81

Binary file (176309 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-2img5.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-2img6.jpg · Sequence: 82

Binary file (52911 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-2img6.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-2img7.jpg · Sequence: 83

Binary file (194145 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-2img7.jpg

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Filename: ea029953301_ex99-3img1.jpg · Sequence: 84

Binary file (4445 bytes)

Download ea029953301_ex99-3img1.jpg

XML — IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT

XML

Filename: R1.htm · Sequence: 90

v3.26.1

Cover

Jul. 28, 2026

Document Type

8-K

Amendment Flag

false

Document Period End Date

Jul. 28, 2026

Entity File Number

001-38003

Entity Registrant Name

Ramaco Resources, Inc.

Entity Central Index Key

0001687187

Entity Tax Identification Number

38-4018838

Entity Incorporation, State or Country Code

DE

Entity Address, Address Line One

250 West Main Street

Entity Address, Address Line Two

Suite 1900

Entity Address, City or Town

Lexington

Entity Address, State or Province

KY

Entity Address, Postal Zip Code

40507

City Area Code

859

Local Phone Number

244-7455

Written Communications

false

Soliciting Material

false

Pre-commencement Tender Offer

false

Pre-commencement Issuer Tender Offer

false

Entity Emerging Growth Company

false

Class A Common Stock,

Title of 12(b) Security

Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value

Trading Symbol

METC

Security Exchange Name

NASDAQ

Class B Common Stock,

Title of 12(b) Security

Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value

Trading Symbol

METCB

Security Exchange Name

NASDAQ

8.375% Senior Notes due 2029

Title of 12(b) Security

8.375% Senior Notes due 2029

Trading Symbol

METCZ

Security Exchange Name

NASDAQ

8.250% Senior Notes due 2030

Title of 12(b) Security

8.250% Senior Notes due 2030

Trading Symbol

METCI

Security Exchange Name

NASDAQ

X

- Definition

Boolean flag that is true when the XBRL content amends previously-filed or accepted submission.

+ References

No definition available.

+ Details

Name:

dei_AmendmentFlag

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

xbrli:booleanItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Area code of city

+ References

No definition available.

+ Details

Name:

dei_CityAreaCode

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

xbrli:normalizedStringItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

For the EDGAR submission types of Form 8-K: the date of the report, the date of the earliest event reported; for the EDGAR submission types of Form N-1A: the filing date; for all other submission types: the end of the reporting or transition period. The format of the date is YYYY-MM-DD.

+ References

No definition available.

+ Details

Name:

dei_DocumentPeriodEndDate

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

xbrli:dateItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

The type of document being provided (such as 10-K, 10-Q, 485BPOS, etc). The document type is limited to the same value as the supporting SEC submission type, or the word 'Other'.

+ References

No definition available.

+ Details

Name:

dei_DocumentType

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

dei:submissionTypeItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Address Line 1 such as Attn, Building Name, Street Name

+ References

No definition available.

+ Details

Name:

dei_EntityAddressAddressLine1

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

xbrli:normalizedStringItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Address Line 2 such as Street or Suite number

+ References

No definition available.

+ Details

Name:

dei_EntityAddressAddressLine2

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

xbrli:normalizedStringItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Name of the City or Town

+ References

No definition available.

+ Details

Name:

dei_EntityAddressCityOrTown

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

xbrli:normalizedStringItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Code for the postal or zip code

+ References

No definition available.

+ Details

Name:

dei_EntityAddressPostalZipCode

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

xbrli:normalizedStringItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Name of the state or province.

+ References

No definition available.

+ Details

Name:

dei_EntityAddressStateOrProvince

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

dei:stateOrProvinceItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

A unique 10-digit SEC-issued value to identify entities that have filed disclosures with the SEC. It is commonly abbreviated as CIK.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher SEC

-Name Exchange Act

-Number 240

-Section 12

-Subsection b-2

+ Details

Name:

dei_EntityCentralIndexKey

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

dei:centralIndexKeyItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Indicate if registrant meets the emerging growth company criteria.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher SEC

-Name Exchange Act

-Number 240

-Section 12

-Subsection b-2

+ Details

Name:

dei_EntityEmergingGrowthCompany

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

xbrli:booleanItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Commission file number. The field allows up to 17 characters. The prefix may contain 1-3 digits, the sequence number may contain 1-8 digits, the optional suffix may contain 1-4 characters, and the fields are separated with a hyphen.

+ References

No definition available.

+ Details

Name:

dei_EntityFileNumber

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

dei:fileNumberItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Two-character EDGAR code representing the state or country of incorporation.

+ References

No definition available.

+ Details

Name:

dei_EntityIncorporationStateCountryCode

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

dei:edgarStateCountryItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

The exact name of the entity filing the report as specified in its charter, which is required by forms filed with the SEC.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher SEC

-Name Exchange Act

-Number 240

-Section 12

-Subsection b-2

+ Details

Name:

dei_EntityRegistrantName

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

xbrli:normalizedStringItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

The Tax Identification Number (TIN), also known as an Employer Identification Number (EIN), is a unique 9-digit value assigned by the IRS.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher SEC

-Name Exchange Act

-Number 240

-Section 12

-Subsection b-2

+ Details

Name:

dei_EntityTaxIdentificationNumber

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

dei:employerIdItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Local phone number for entity.

+ References

No definition available.

+ Details

Name:

dei_LocalPhoneNumber

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

xbrli:normalizedStringItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Boolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher SEC

-Name Exchange Act

-Number 240

-Section 13e

-Subsection 4c

+ Details

Name:

dei_PreCommencementIssuerTenderOffer

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

xbrli:booleanItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Boolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher SEC

-Name Exchange Act

-Number 240

-Section 14d

-Subsection 2b

+ Details

Name:

dei_PreCommencementTenderOffer

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

xbrli:booleanItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Title of a 12(b) registered security.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher SEC

-Name Exchange Act

-Number 240

-Section 12

-Subsection b

+ Details

Name:

dei_Security12bTitle

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

dei:securityTitleItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Name of the Exchange on which a security is registered.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher SEC

-Name Exchange Act

-Number 240

-Section 12

-Subsection d1-1

+ Details

Name:

dei_SecurityExchangeName

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

dei:edgarExchangeCodeItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Boolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher SEC

-Name Exchange Act

-Number 240

-Section 14a

-Subsection 12

+ Details

Name:

dei_SolicitingMaterial

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

xbrli:booleanItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Trading symbol of an instrument as listed on an exchange.

+ References

No definition available.

+ Details

Name:

dei_TradingSymbol

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

dei:tradingSymbolItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Definition

Boolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher SEC

-Name Securities Act

-Number 230

-Section 425

+ Details

Name:

dei_WrittenCommunications

Namespace Prefix:

dei_

Data Type:

xbrli:booleanItemType

Balance Type:

na

Period Type:

duration

X

- Details

Name:

us-gaap_StatementClassOfStockAxis=METC_ClassCommonStockMember

Namespace Prefix:

Data Type:

na

Balance Type:

Period Type:

X

- Details

Name:

us-gaap_StatementClassOfStockAxis=METC_ClassBCommonStockMember

Namespace Prefix:

Data Type:

na

Balance Type:

Period Type:

X

- Details

Name:

us-gaap_StatementClassOfStockAxis=METC_Sec8.375SeniorNotesDue2029Member

Namespace Prefix:

Data Type:

na

Balance Type:

Period Type:

X

- Details

Name:

us-gaap_StatementClassOfStockAxis=METC_Sec8.250SeniorNotesDue2030Member

Namespace Prefix:

Data Type:

na

Balance Type:

Period Type: