Groowe Groowe BETA / Newsroom
⏱ News is delayed by 15 minutes. Sign in for real-time access. Sign in

Global Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Market Forecast, 2026-2031 | AI, Digital Twins, and OT Security Drive Growth to USD 206.31 Billion

globenewswire.com
FCEL Mentioned as a vendor in the critical infrastructure protection market, but no specific sentiment or performance data is provided. FTNT Mentioned as a major vendor in the critical infrastructure protection market, but no specific sentiment or performance data is provided. CSCO Mentioned as a major vendor in the critical infrastructure protection market, but no specific sentiment or performance data is provided. LMT Mentioned as a major vendor in the critical infrastructure protection market, but no specific sentiment or performance data is provided. GD Mentioned as a major vendor in the critical infrastructure protection market, but no specific sentiment or performance data is provided. NOC Mentioned as a major vendor in the critical infrastructure protection market, but no specific sentiment or performance data is provided. HON Mentioned as a major vendor in the critical infrastructure protection market, but no specific sentiment or performance data is provided. SNOW Mentioned as a vendor in the critical infrastructure protection market, but no specific sentiment or performance data is provided. GE Mentioned as GE Vernova, a vendor in the critical infrastructure protection market, but no specific sentiment or performance data is provided. T Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. VZ Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. AVGO Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. AMD Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. NVDA Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. MSFT Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. GOOG Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. AMZN Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. IBM Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. PANW Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. CRWD Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. DDOG Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. ETSY Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. PLTR Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. SMCI Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. QCOM Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. INTC Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. MU Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. AMAT Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. LRCX Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. ASML Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. ADI Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. TXN Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. MRVL Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. NXPI Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. ON Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. STM Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. INFY Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. ACN Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. HPQ Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. DELL Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. CDNS Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. SNPS Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. MCHP Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. AEHR Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. TER Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. AMKR Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. WDC Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. SE Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. BABA Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. JD Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. NTES Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. PDD Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. IQ Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. BEKE Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. RBLX Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. EXAS Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. REGN Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. GILD Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. BMY Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. AMGN Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. VRTX Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. AZN Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. MRK Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. LLY Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. SNY Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. ABBV Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. BIIB Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. XRAY Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. ISRG Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. MDLZ Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. ADM Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. KHC Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. PEP Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. KO Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. MCD Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. SBUX Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. YUM Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. CMG Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. NKE Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. LULU Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. BBY Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. TJX Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. HD Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. LOW Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. COST Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. WMT Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. GOOGL Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. AAPL Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. META Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. NFLX Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. DIS Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. CMCSA Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. S Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. BA Mentioned as a potential beneficiary of infrastructure modernization and increased demand for IT/OT security, but not explicitly named as a vendor. AIR Mentioned as a vendor in the critical infrastructure protection market, but no specific sentiment or performance data is provided. TH Mentioned as a vendor in the critical infrastructure protection market, but no specific sentiment or performance data is provided. TENB Mentioned as a vendor in the critical infrastructure protection market, but no specific sentiment or performance data is provided. CLAR Mentioned as a vendor in the critical infrastructure protection market, but no specific sentiment or performance data is provided. BAC Announced a $250 billion initiative for critical infrastructure finance, indicating a positive outlook for the sector, but no direct company sentiment.

Global Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Market Forecast, 2026-2031 | AI, Digital Twins, and OT Security Drive Growth to USD 206.31 Billion Dublin, Oct. 13, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- "Critical Infrastructure Protection Market: Global Forecast to 2031" has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The global critical infrastructure protection (CIP) market is projected to grow from USD 160.28 billion in 2026 to USD 206.31 billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 5.2% during the forecast period. Market growth is being driven by escalating cyber and physical threats, infrastructure modernization, stricter resilience requirements, and the rising need to maintain uninterrupted operations across essential facilities.

Critical infrastructure operators are strengthening emergency power and backup-generation systems to support continuity during grid failures, natural disasters, and other disruptions. These investments are increasing demand for perimeter protection, access control, surveillance, monitoring, and OT security across generators, substations, fuel systems, and backup power equipment. Greater dependence on reliable power is also accelerating the adoption of integrated CIP solutions that combine physical security, IT cybersecurity, and OT cybersecurity.

Digital twin platforms to record the fastest growth

Within IT cybersecurity solutions, the digital twin platforms for OT security & infrastructure management segment is expected to register the highest CAGR during the forecast period. Critical infrastructure organizations are increasingly using virtual replicas of physical assets, industrial processes, and network environments to evaluate operational conditions, identify vulnerabilities, assess potential security impacts, and test response strategies without disrupting live systems.

Growing deployment of complex OT environments across energy, manufacturing, transportation, and utilities is strengthening demand for predictive security and infrastructure management. Integration with asset visibility, vulnerability assessment, predictive analytics, and scenario simulation enables organizations to improve proactive risk management, operational resilience, and incident preparedness.

Surveillance & monitoring systems to lead physical security

Surveillance & monitoring systems are projected to account for the largest share of the physical security systems market in 2026. Adoption is expanding across energy facilities, transportation infrastructure, industrial sites, government buildings, and commercial premises as operators prioritize continuous asset monitoring, perimeter protection, intrusion detection, and situational awareness.

CCTV, thermal imaging, video analytics, and drone detection technologies are supporting the transition toward centralized and intelligent monitoring. Integration with access control, intrusion detection, emergency communications, and security operations platforms allows infrastructure operators to identify incidents faster, coordinate responses, and protect geographically distributed assets more effectively.

North America to hold the largest market share

North America is projected to lead the CIP market in 2026, supported by large-scale modernization of power, transportation, water, communications, and digital infrastructure. In the US, Bank of America announced a USD 250 billion Critical Infrastructure Finance Initiative covering energy, transportation, water, digital infrastructure, and related systems. Canada is committing USD 51 billion through its Build Communities Strong Fund for transportation, water, healthcare, broadband, and other infrastructure priorities.

Cross-border grid modernization is creating additional demand for integrated security. A new US-Canada transmission project will add up to 650 MW of transfer capacity, while Canada expects national electricity demand to double by 2050. These developments are expected to increase investment in physical security, IT cybersecurity, OT protection, asset visibility, and integrated monitoring solutions.

Research coverage

The report provides market forecasts across physical security offerings, IT cybersecurity solutions and services, and OT cybersecurity solutions and services. Physical security coverage includes perimeter protection, surveillance and monitoring, access control, screening and scanning, emergency communication, professional services, and managed services.

IT cybersecurity coverage includes network and endpoint protection, identity and access management, cloud and application security, encryption and data protection, threat detection and response platforms, compliance and policy management, patch management, and data backup and recovery. OT cybersecurity coverage includes OT and ICS security platforms, IoT and IIoT security, OT threat detection and monitoring, digital twin platforms, and asset identification and visibility.

The market analysis spans financial institutions, government, defense, the commercial sector, IT and telecom, chemicals and manufacturing, transport and logistics, energy and power, oil and gas, and other verticals. Regional coverage includes North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and Latin America.

Competitive landscape

Major CIP market vendors include Axis Communications, TPG (Forcepoint G2CI), Fortinet, Cisco, BAE Systems, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Northrop Grumman, Honeywell, Airbus, Thales, Tenable, ServiceNow, Siemens, Huawei, GE Vernova, NEC Corporation, Fujitsu, Dragos, Claroty, Nozomi Networks, Xage Security, TXOne Networks, OTORIO, XM Cyber, Radiflow, DeNexus, Cyolo, SecurityGate.io, and Applied Risk. The report evaluates company profiles, product and business offerings, recent developments, market shares, service portfolios, and growth strategies.

Primary research breakdown

Key market insights

The report helps established providers and new entrants assess revenue opportunities across the overall CIP market and its subsegments. It also supports competitive benchmarking, product development, market diversification, investment planning, and go-to-market strategy development by providing insights into market drivers, restraints, opportunities, challenges, technology trends, and regional growth prospects.

Key Attributes:

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/240kj4

About ResearchAndMarkets.com

ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.